Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Playoff Machine


CoastalCat

Recommended Posts

I also noticed that we don't have the little notation in the standings (usually an x or something), that designates that playoffs are clinched. After much tinkering, I found one of very very few scenarios where we miss the playoffs. Some of the games look a little funny because I started, after obviously setting the Panthers to lose out, by having NFC teams win every inter-conference game going forward to prop up the other teams. 

Link: Panthers miss playoffs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, CoastalCat said:

I also noticed that we don't have the little notation in the standings (usually an x or something), that designates that playoffs are clinched. After much tinkering, I found one of very very few scenarios where we miss the playoffs. Some of the games look a little funny because I started, after obviously setting the Panthers to lose out, by having NFC teams win every inter-conference game going forward to prop up the other teams. 

Link: Panthers miss playoffs

I actually found one where not only do we miss the playoffs, but so does New England.  I had both the NFC East and AFC South where everybody were at 6-10.  Needless to say it involved some highly unlikely results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CoastalCat said:

Sorry if this was posted last week while i was running the gauntlet, but ESPN re-opened the playoff machine. Feel free to add links or screenshots of your favorite road to the Owl.

 

ESPN Playoff Machine

 

Here's mine: 16-0 Beaches!

Yes, it was also posted last week.  Here's the thread:

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/boards/topic/121647-espn-playoff-machine/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, UpstatePanther said:

I am all for the rest of the NFC South missing the playoffs. It's hard to beat a team 3 times in one year. Not scared of facing any NFC South opponent, but still... would rather not face an NFC South opponent in the playoffs.

i had the bucs and falcons both narrowly missing it. jags also narrowly missed winning the afcs, which would've been fun.

if these predictions are right i think we play the winner of the weakest seeded host team in the wildcard round, right? that would be the winner of vikings-redskins, which would probably be vikings, who i think we would annihilate at home. we would almost certainly then draw arizona at home and hopefully knock them off en route to the superbowl.

i could see the afccg being patriots-bengals or patriots-steelers. either one would be really interesting, actually. the steelers make me nervous, but we can take down the bengals and the pats, i think.

amazing that this is all realistic and not august homerism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, PhillyB said:

 

if these predictions are right i think we play the winner of the weakest seeded host team in the wildcard round, right? that would be the winner of vikings-redskins, which would probably be vikings, who i think we would annihilate at home. we would almost certainly then draw arizona at home and hopefully knock them off en route to the superbowl.

 

The divisional round would be us vs the weakest seed to win in wild card round.  So if GB wins if you predictions are correct, they are our opponent no matter what happens in the other game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just checked this morning after the dust settled from week 12. 

Panthers still haven't clinched a playoff spot, but we clinch in week 13 if we win.

The fun part? Even if we completely lose out, we are in if...

1. Green Bay loses

or

2. Arizona loses

or

3. Atlanta loses

or

4. Seattle loses 

 

So just sit back, relax, and watch the world burn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I played with it a bit.  All I've seen is how Seattle is on a collision course to play us in the 2nd round of the playoffs over and over.  They are likely ending up a wildcard team.  If they're the #6 team and they win, regardless of what else happens they play the Panthers in round 2.  If they're the #5 seed we'd have to hope the #6 team wins their game as well to avoid them (Likely either Green Bay or Minnesota - so it's possible).  

Panthers fans should be watching the Seattle @ Minnesota matchup this week...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...