Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

J.Jones.... Karma is a bitch


Jmac

Recommended Posts

I gave the Dallas forums a look see to get a feel for the fan reaction. Seems that the #76 love fest is over. Doesn't show up for big games and is a problem child. Exact same thing when he was here. They are pissed that he was having an "ass grab" with his old teammates after the game. All say Jones was a fool for signing him and to let him walk next season.

They blame Jones for forcing Romo back to early just to 'win'. Many feel that Romo is done after this injury. They feel that Garret is a 'puppet' and should have spoke up if he didn't think Romo was ready.

Karma is a bitch. You reap what you sow. You deserve the ass beating you got yesterday. Romo was your sacrificial lamb.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy was good as a player for us and was disruptive in the game for them.Romo had a very good game last week so yeah u can't say he shouldn't have been out there at least in the first half. You could argue he should have gotten pulled in the third before the injury but that is hindsight. 

Before the game everyone was happy Romo was playing and thought Hardy would be a beast. Funny how things change after the fact. This is just Dallas fans bitching and coming down to earth. Probably not much different from the comments that would be made on the huddle if we were in the same situation.  Sad but true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

Honestly, Hardy was a case of a player not wanting to destroy his former team.  The Cowboys fans were right he didn't play like the crazy man we have seen. Dude still misses Carolina and bleeds black and blue. 

Dumbest thread today.

You have to be kidding if you think Hardy didn't play hard because he wanted to respect Carolina. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can see that the faceless, nameless team is one that Hardy still loves and is bonded to.

It doesn't take a genius to see he realizes he effed up and is on the wrong team now.

Jerruh can kiss my @$$ as he is reaping what he sows and he himself torched the Cowboys season and offense with the offseason trades/releases and pressuring Garrett to bring Romo back so soon.  I hate the Cowturds and hate seeing a player get hurt, but I don't regret watching the Cowgirls lose and especially to the Panthers.

I had too many games at Christmas time the past 8 years to reflect on with poor officiating, mental breakdowns, etc. to have any regrets other than seeing unfortunate injuries.

GO PANTHERS!  #KEEPPOUNDING!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

LOL Hardy was sick and would still be destroying with our team...the fact that our teammates still show him so much love speaks volumes honestly.

It definitely does....  

 

 

That's why it's illegal to leave the scene of an accident.  So the car doesn't go wreck itself after claiming you haven't seen crazy yet. 

 

That's how it works right?   I could be wrong. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MadHatter said:

Dumbest thread today.

You have to be kidding if you think Hardy didn't play hard because he wanted to respect Carolina. 

Guess you have not read some of your own post. It was clear Hardy did not go kraken on us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...