Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Captain America: Civil War

scpanther22

By scpanther22,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, CCS said:

I was excited for this. It just looks like another Marvel faux epic at this point though. I'm glad Marvel is creating new franchises because their classic formula just doesn't cut it for me anymore.

Seriously guy? You are honestly going to tell me you are LESS excited after seeing this trailer? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

To me, too. I mean, Bucky? Bucky is the reason for The Civil War???? I knew Marvel and Disney would water down the story arc for a movie adaptation but I hate this angle.

That's not the only reason for the civil war. We only saw the trailer but clearly they are still doing the philsofical differences between Tony and Steve. I mean I take your opinion with a grain of salt anyway. I'd bet my entire life savings you are the first person to make a thread bashing this movie regardless if it is good or bad just cause it's marvel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Well, I comprehend that Marvel can't use the 'mutant' angle because Fox apparently owns those rights but this Civil War is a direct result of Rogers disagreeing with how out government views him and Bucky now. However, at the same time, Tony Stark goes from 'Screw you, big brother! You can't have my suit or my services!" to "Yes sir. Captain America and Bucky are a threat to National Security".

Sorry, your BS excuse for why I can't stand Disney's/Marvel conservative, cookie cutter formula is laughable. Odds are I'm a bigger Marvel fan than you.

You do realize Tony's characterization has been pretty consistent on this issue since the end of Avengers 1 right? Dude straight looked at the brink of all human life ending and thought he was going to die to by the end of that movie. That changes a person.  His actions haven't just appeared out of no where. But I wouldn't expect a DC fanboy who uses bullshit like "cookie-cutter" and "watered down" to describe the most successful expanded universe in cinematic history.

 

just save your posts for when DC FINALLY drops a movie trying to cash in on that marvel money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Tony Stark's story arc in the MCU has been consistent? Ha! And ironically you're calling me a fanboy. Sorry, just because I don't agree every film Marvel Studios releases/produces is a smashing success (quality wise) doesn't make me a 'hater'. You, on the other hand, are a pompous nuthugger who can't handle criticism towards Age of Ultron, Ant Man, Thor: TDW, Iron Man 3, etc. You're probably one of those idiots who actually believes Spider-Man 3 was 10x better than Watchmen just because Spider-Man is a Marvel property.

Yep, I'm a DC fanboy who just happens to have Captain America: TWS, Guardians of the Galaxy, Iron Man, Blade and and X2 in his Top 10 CBMs of all time, and values underrated titles like The Punisher with Thomas Jane. 

If you have anything to refute that claim present your evidence now or walk away shamed. No one is praising every marvel movie. You just swing into every marvel thread spewing the same poo. We get it, you are an emo who likes dark comic book movies. You aren't cool for trying to poo on movies everyone else enjoys because you have built in bias.

 

"Sorry, just because I don't agree every film Marvel Studios releases/produces is a smashing success (quality wise) doesn't make me a 'hater'."

um you haven't liked any. From your posts you've gone out of your way to trot out the same shitty catch phrases to INSANELY successful movies because you can't handle how WB/DC has dropped the ball in every conceivable way until Chris Nolan brought them back to relevance. And this comes from a guy who ONLY owns DC comics. I'm no Marvel nuthugger. I'm a realist and you are a hater. 

The reason those marvel movies in your top 10 is because Marvel has simply been better at making comic book movies. That's the simple truth, facts, reason, and logic support this. and I know that hurts your little heart.

also you look dumb for trying to bring in a Sony movie has if that has any relevance on how Marvel studios makes better movies than WB

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, CarolinaCoolin said:

You tried Francis. maybe go back to try to change the post you DIDNT respond to next instead of following me into other threads like a lost puppy?

Settle down Beavis.

Have a laugh every once in a while, you might enjoy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

Yeah they couldn't use mutants, and maybe they could use Inhumans but they only have had a part on Agents of Shield and the viewers aren't invested in those characters yet, so they have to use what we've seen.

We're going to get Black Panther and the new Spider-Man for the first time in this movie and we don't know exactly their roles.  It's still early and it was just a trailer.  Stark obviously wants to register EVERY "special" person so it's going to affect more than Bucky, but that just hits home with Cap obviously.  You think Stark wants Scarlet Witch just walking around unwatched? 

It's any important movie, I don't think Stark and Cap ever have the same relationship again after this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mrcompletely11
      Edge Rushers

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • MHS831
      High look overview...

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Jackie Lee
      Dream big: Imagine this future and tell me how you feel

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...