Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question of the day? Re: women and tattoos


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I think that tats take away from a woman's natural beauty. 

I tend to agree. I like my woman natural. Hair color, no piercings aside from ears and maybe a nose stud, no tattoos preferably. That being said, I've seen some damn fine women who have tattoos in just the right places. Hip tattoos are great, as are rib tattoos. Anything else, I find to be too much.

There's only one exception to this rule, and that's the girl I'm with right now. She already has multiple tattoos, and I love them all because I love her. During different phases of her life, she's had alot of different piercings too, though now she only keeps her earlobes open. She's special to me, so I find her additions attractive as well. The same wouldn't be said of another woman if Nichole and I ever split up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, UpstatePanther said:

I tend to agree. I like my woman natural. Hair color, no piercings aside from ears and maybe a nose stud, no tattoos preferably. That being said, I've seen some damn fine women who have tattoos in just the right places. Hip tattoos are great, as are rib tattoos. Anything else, I find to be too much.

There's only one exception to this rule, and that's the girl I'm with right now. She already has multiple tattoos, and I love them all because I love her. During different phases of her life, she's had alot of different piercings too, though now she only keeps her earlobes open. She's special to me, so I find her additions attractive as well. The same wouldn't be said of another woman if Nichole and I ever split up.

Good.  Let us know when there are impending nuptials. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UpstatePanther said:

I tend to agree. I like my woman natural. Hair color, no piercings aside from ears and maybe a nose stud, no tattoos preferably. That being said, I've seen some damn fine women who have tattoos in just the right places. Hip tattoos are great, as are rib tattoos. Anything else, I find to be too much.

There's only one exception to this rule, and that's the girl I'm with right now. She already has multiple tattoos, and I love them all because I love her. During different phases of her life, she's had alot of different piercings too, though now she only keeps her earlobes open. She's special to me, so I find her additions attractive as well. The same wouldn't be said of another woman if Nichole and I ever split up.

Don't worry bro, I got you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

I would never be with a woman who has any tattoos. Just not my style. I don't judge people if they have them and don't really care what they do I just wouldn't want to have a wife/girlfriend with tattoos.

A pin-up on a little hottie is a definite turn-on. If I had picks to back this up, I'll bet you'd change your mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Don't worry bro, I got you.

Hahahahah. How ever did you know?! ;)

 

45 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Good.  Let us know when there are impending nuptials. 

Sorry to make everyone puke rainbows. I'll now chug a beer, scratch my ass, burp as loud as I can, and tell her to go make me a sammich. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
    • If Canales has helped Bryce a “poo ton” and this is what we have then what’s the fuging point? And the offense wasn’t humming with Dalton in there either, except against the raiders who’ll likely be firing their coach after this season.  XL is probably the fourth best looking receiving option on the team right now behind thielen, Coker, and sanders. I don’t think anyone would disagree with that. Who cares about total receiving yards when everyone else has missed time and there’s like 180 yards of receiving a game to go around   and lmao they were “believing” shut the fug up. They lost and for the most part those games were all the defense shutting down the other team. The chiefs turned around and gave up an actual impressive stat line to Aiden O’Connell and I not even the most delusional raiders fans think that means anything. Bryce did nothing against the eagles, the Bucs are a mash unit, and any one of us could have done that Bryce did against the giants and saints.  And as far as who they’d get, they didn’t have any trouble hiring the guy you’re tripping over yourself to defend. They also could have hired Dan Quinn, who’s actually succeeding with a young qb.  And people are acting like the risk of getting paid for not working for five years is a negative. Canales is going to spend the next half a decade getting paid to watch porn in his Bible camp office.
    • the Dallas game definitely quelled the hype. his biggest issue will always be his size, and that shows when he gets sacked. he's simply not big or strong enough to protect the ball. even in the KC game, he fumbled it on a basic sack and thank god icky landed on it. INT's are going to happen, most fans don't understand that tipped balls and wrong routes account for most interceptions. but the wet-bar-of-soap type fumbles upon contact are a huge reg flag. the common theme with players like Darnold and Mayfield who previously played for us and are now excelling makes me want to practice patience more when it comes to the QB position. I think Bryce bought himself another season, perhaps with more weapons. I do like the idea of adding a QB whether that's a FA or mid round rookie. if the same mistakes occur next season and we see no further growth or most importantly, wins, then it will be time to move on. just a quick reminder though, football is not an individual sport. QB is just one position, albeit the most important. 
×
×
  • Create New...