Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is star regressing or are injuries to blame?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Marguide said:

I agree with pretty much all of this. My point was directed more at the frequent claim on here that KK's success is because Star is pulling double teams, thus freeing up Kwann. And that's just not accurate.

I was agreeing with you which may not have been clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Star's role is more so about helping Luke and the DEs than Short.

But that said, the characterization of him being the one who does the 'dirty work' while others net the stats is correct.

I don't really see him as having regressed this year, and I believe the team well understands the value of what he does.

He was pretty bad in the first quarter of the season, but given the fact that he is back to what we've come to expect of him these past 3-4 games I'm writing that off due to his injury recovery in the offseason and the preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still hoping to keep both.

It reminds me of back when the Bucs had Warren Sapp and Anthony McFarland at full strength. Sapp was the one everybody knew about, but McFarland was arguably just as important to what they did on defense even though you didn't hear his name called as frequently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

I'll be completely honest, if it came down to keeping Star or Short, I'm backing KK. Love has done a great job and he'll come cheap. Short has established himself as an elite pass rushing DT (an Aaron Donald, Geno Atkins, Gerald McCoy, etc). Those don't exactly grow on trees.

Star's injuries definitely play a factor in this decision as well.

Given a choice, I'm taking KK too, but I hope and think we keep both.

While Love has done a decent job in rotation, we seem to give up more yards on the ground when he is in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, stirs said:

Everyone seems to have the same "read it on a website" opinion about Star.

Watch film

Is he constantly double teamed?  Is he the famed "space eater"?

Should he get a big contract or should we draft another big guy?  Or offer him something moderate.

THIS.

 

Only way to truly discern what he's doing is to watch film. Hard to say for sure without it.

 

I'd go out on a limb and say 95% of the posters in this thread haven't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...