A couple questionable decision from yesterday game

[GoobyPls]

11 hours ago, KSpan said:

Probably because they want as little wear on Cam as possible, and RBs are supposed to be able to punch it in from the 1. Cam was limping a bit at one point.

No idea, unless they thought there was some kind of favorable matchup with that specific corner where Cotchery's savvy would get him open.

Probably because he's only in for certain packages, though I wouldn't be surprised to see his role increasing. He's still the #4 WR in terms of depth chart.

Delaire was at right end on multiple occasions and couldnt get past Lewan, unless you mean why not put him at LE and let him go against right tackles like Bell. 

They should of let Cam throw it, not run the same play over and over again.

 

And Delaire hasn't played RE since the bucs game. Allen and Addison are playing RE, Delaire is rotating with Ealy at LE

[lightsout]

I think we got off our usual play-calling this week simply because it is the Titans. I think Shula recognized that we can be efficient in other ways then our typical runs and passes and changed things up. Also, yes, Cam got a break this game. It's a non-conference game, so why risk it? If we struggled more offensively, I'm sure things would have been called differently. Fortunately, we executed well enough to pull out the win and didn't get Cam hurt in the process. I'm good with that. Cam is the golden ticket. Must keep him healthy.

Washington, we're going to go in and do much of the same. Short week and the Cowboys game is bigger. We'll do the bare minimum to secure that win like we did this week, and it should be more than enough, because we're just better. We'll go back to more GB-esque offense at Dallas on Thanksgiving.

[Donald LaFell]

10 hours ago, Kurb said:

This and not countering the "fug it send 9" blitzes that led to so many of the sacks sooner.

 

Did they really send 9 at one point? 

[pstall]

Titans HAD to blitz more becaue of their two dbs being out.

I like Cam not running as much.  I would like to see more screens to get that element of tje offense clicking. Tolbert and Stew need Fozzy or CAP to get a few more touches.

[Marguide]

43 minutes ago, lightsout said:

... Short week and the Cowboys game is bigger. We'll do the bare minimum to secure that win like we did this week, and it should be more than enough, because we're just better. We'll go back to more GB-esque offense at Dallas on Thanksgiving.

Why? I know everybody tends to think of Dallas as a big game, but other than it's national exposure, Washington is the more important game.

1) It's the next game

2) Washington's record is better than Dallas'

You could make the case that the Dallas game is one of the least important left on our schedule.

[lightsout]

8 minutes ago, Marguide said:

Why? I know everybody tends to think of Dallas as a big game, but other than it's national exposure, Washington is the more important game.

1) It's the next game

2) Washington's record is better than Dallas'

You could make the case that the Dallas game is one of the least important left on our schedule.

 

It's the bigger game because it is on a short week and it is thanksgiving. And the cowboys should be healthier than they've been in over a month.  Win that game, huge momentum boost. Lose it, could throw off confidence heading in to Atlanta. 

 

Washington doesn't scare me like Dallas. For this week, sure Washington is the most important because it is next. But Dallas has more potential to beat us, IMO 

[Marguide]

54 minutes ago, lightsout said:

 

It's the bigger game because it is on a short week and it is thanksgiving. And the cowboys should be healthier than they've been in over a month.  Win that game, huge momentum boost. Lose it, could throw off confidence heading in to Atlanta. 

 

Washington doesn't scare me like Dallas. For this week, sure Washington is the most important because it is next. But Dallas has more potential to beat us, IMO 

But as far as importance in the NFC standings, Dallas means almost nothing. They have lost 7 in a row. Romo or no Romo, they're going nowhere.

[Marguide]

1 hour ago, lightsout said:

 

It's the bigger game because it is on a short week and it is thanksgiving. And the cowboys should be healthier than they've been in over a month.  Win that game, huge momentum boost. Lose it, could throw off confidence heading in to Atlanta. 

 

Washington doesn't scare me like Dallas. For this week, sure Washington is the most important because it is next. But Dallas has more potential to beat us, IMO 

Don't get me wrong, until I really started to think about it, I felt just like you. But then I began to focus on Wash, and realized they are 2 games up on Dallas, and are coming off a big win. They have a legit shot at the NFCE.

Dallas is all glitz and hype. Could they beat us? Absolutely. But so could the Skins, and call me greedy, but I'm not ready to see us lose.

Here's to spanking both their asses.

[Tarheels23]

I questioned the run selections as well yesterday, but then I realize it was a statement thing. We practice all week on our 4 minute offense, which consist of a lot of runs from undercenter. This part of our offense will need to improve, especially during these cold weather months.