Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we are 10-0 and Falcons 6-5 going into Dallas, Should RR pull a Popovich?


PanthersUnited

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, PanthersUnited said:

For those who dont watch NBA, Popovich is the HC of the Spurs and is very well known for resting starters in certain situations during the season. One situation is late in the season when the team has to play a back to back (which is equal to a short week in the NFL playing on a Thursday) and the team has all but locked up a playoff berth, he catches a lot of flak and heat from other teams and the NBA for doing it but it works and its why the Spurs have the success they do.

Falcons have the Colts and Vikes up next so they could very easily be staring at 6-5 and us 10-0 heading into Dallas. As many have said on here, refs and Jerry Jones will have the fix in on that game anyway with Romo back, (remember last year with the Megatron catch) I say fug em, what better way to show disrespect to the Cowgirls then resting a lot of our starters that game, also would be a let down for Hardy because you know he is looking forward to that game.

You will think im crazy but with how Rivera has talked in recent weeks about "have to be smart when it comes to players down the stretch." I wouldnt put it past him.. Id say we would still probably win anyway and if not, 10-1 wont hurt us.. Now IF we arent 10-0 and Falcons arent 6-5 then ofcourse all bets are off.

Yeah it makes soooo much sense to mail in the 11th game of the season, when we couldn't possibly have clinched home field advantage, on a national stage against "America's team" on Thanksgiving day. When you spell it out, it makes even less sense that most dumb poo you suggest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PanthersUnited said:

For those who dont watch NBA, Popovich is the HC of the Spurs and is very well known for resting starters in certain situations during the season. One situation is late in the season when the team has to play a back to back (which is equal to a short week in the NFL playing on a Thursday) and the team has all but locked up a playoff berth, he catches a lot of flak and heat from other teams and the NBA for doing it but it works and its why the Spurs have the success they do.

Falcons have the Colts and Vikes up next so they could very easily be staring at 6-5 and us 10-0 heading into Dallas. As many have said on here, refs and Jerry Jones will have the fix in on that game anyway with Romo back, (remember last year with the Megatron catch) I say fug em, what better way to show disrespect to the Cowgirls then resting a lot of our starters that game, also would be a let down for Hardy because you know he is looking forward to that game.

You will think im crazy but with how Rivera has talked in recent weeks about "have to be smart when it comes to players down the stretch." I wouldnt put it past him.. Id say we would still probably win anyway and if not, 10-1 wont hurt us.. Now IF we arent 10-0 and Falcons arent 6-5 then ofcourse all bets are off.

I'm going to that game...so nah man...that's the only panthers game i'm catching live...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best thing that could happen is that we blow out the Redskins EARLY and then can rest some of our starters in the 2nd half...   Here's hoping to 30+ points against Washington in the 1st half!!  :-)

Not really likely, but hey, Panthers keep finding new ways to win.  Let's add early blow out to the repertoire!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Donald LaFell said:

Until homefield is locked up it's a horrible bad idea. 

Exactly.

No NFL coach ever, under any circumstances, would even remotely consider resting starters early for any reason other than that home field advantage is locked up. And even then, some still consider it a bad idea.

There is no logic or spin you can come up with that will make it into a good idea. It's a waste of effort trying.

This is not going to happen. Nor should it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Soooo many bad turnovers again. Luckily Martin played well.  
    • Yes. Cade 100% tripped and pitched it to Mafah.  That’s not in dispute.  We agree on that.  Mafah got the ball, fell to the ground and then attempted to complete the rest of the play….which was the lateral to the WR on the end around.  You are calling the lateral from Mafah to the end around WR the ball popping up.   It was whistled dead.   Then they ran another play.  the review then awarded the ball to SC after we ran another play for what happened after a play was whistled dead.   How does that part work lol?  How do you recover a ball if a play was whistled dead for a downed player prior to a recovery?  I think the refs screwed Clemson twice.   That’s not why they lost.  Please don’t think that is my argument.   They lost because Cade chocked and panicked at the end.  They lost because Sellers should have been put on the ground for a loss countless times and they didn’t.  They lost because our over loyal Dabo wouldn’t bench his favorite hurt RB.    Clemson lost for lots of reasons. SC deserved to win.  Those calls were bad though IMO.  They exist in every game. 
    • I can’t recall an NBA team with this many injuries.  It’s getting absurd at this point
×
×
  • Create New...