Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FBGP's NFL Gameplan's Wk 9 Panthers/Packers Preview

FootballCzar

By FootballCzar,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Datawire Enthusiast

Datawire

Posted
Posted

You spent 12 minutes to explain two plays you drew up for an entire 60 min football game to draw a conclusion to a game for you and your boys to pick Green bay.

A true visionary, you are Em. At least you had the graphics right this time.

Click Bait IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
O-Ther Newbie

O-Ther

Posted
Posted

The way Em tells the Packers doing a contain rush vs. us looks fine on paper for GB if we're in a good down & distance for GB to try that, but is that really a wise decision to leave their dime defender on Thor? 

If it's 4-6 yards to go, Cam'll see 7 in the box and call the line to downblock to the strong side from Kalil down, with Oher and Silatolu sealing off their DT and LB Nick Perry, with the running back/tight end to block the remaining LB at the line or 2nd level to spring Cam. OR checking to a read/option and stressing Perry.

Too many options for GB to defend all game long. It's why we're averaging 27 points per game. Only relevant question is how much gas does our D-line have in the tank? Answer is we'll have more if Addison is good to go so Horton and Ealy can spend more time at DT. Looking forward to Shaq on the field for the blitz calls. He'll be better at rushing than Bene was vs. the Clots, or free up TD to do it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mother Grabber Grand Master

Mother Grabber

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, UpstatePanther said:

Yes he did, but it was good analysis this time. And he's probably going to be right. I've been worried about this game since before the draft. We have the ability to win. Whether we do or not is a completely different story.

if he keeps picking us to lose, I guess he'll be right eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, O-Ther said:

The way Em tells the Packers doing a contain rush vs. us looks fine on paper for GB if we're in a good down & distance for GB to try that, but is that really a wise decision to leave their dime defender on Thor? 

If it's 4-6 yards to go, Cam'll see 7 in the box and call the line to downblock to the strong side from Kalil down, with Oher and Silatolu sealing off their DT and LB Nick Perry, with the running back/tight end to block the remaining LB at the line or 2nd level to spring Cam. OR checking to a read/option and stressing Perry.

Too many options for GB to defend all game long. It's why we're averaging 27 points per game. Only relevant question is how much gas does our D-line have in the tank? Answer is we'll have more if Addison is good to go so Horton and Ealy can spend more time at DT. Looking forward to Shaq on the field for the blitz calls. He'll be better at rushing than Bene was vs. the Clots, or free up TD to do it.

 

 

Don't know whether it was a typo or purposeful,  but referring to the Colts as the "Clots" is pretty humorous.  Perhaps Chud will help Luck stop Luck and his team from bleeding the right way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted

I think I tried to watch one of these a couple years ago.

couldnt make it through and haven't tried again.

i came to ask if anyone else watches these, seems I've gotten my answer in the comments.

 

btw's OP,. If you would actually stick around and discuss in other threads instead of pimping your vids you might get a better reception.

i doubt you will picking against us but at least it wouldn't look like you're just using the huddle as a click booster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      [The Athletic] Dane Brugler's 2025 7-round Mock Draft

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • toldozer
      Game thread

      By toldozer · Posted

      No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...