Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rolling Stone Article


CoastalCat

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this was posted yesterday. It's a pretty disrespectful respect article. 

What angered me the most wasn't really about us specifically...

" Like the Bengals, Carolina isn't taken very seriously. The NFC seems clearly to be the lesser conference this season, but 6-1 Green Bay – after the worst game of Aaron Rodgers' career, a Sunday defeat at Denver – continues to get Super Bowl-level respect. Even 4-4 Seattle, which lost at home to the Panthers in Week 6, casts a longer shadow on the rest of the season than Carolina in the eyes of many."

Well, the NFC has more wins (5 more), but who's counting?

 

Cam Newton Can't Win, So He Stopped Losing Instead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a commentary on the general public's disdain of the Panthers.  We're not the flashy team everyone loves, we're the team that underachieved for the past few years.  We don't have the long term success of New England, the name of Payton Manning,  or the charming nick names of the Seattle Seahawks.  The article says that us and the Bengals are teams that people are watching, but just waiting for them to fold.

Keep watching, keep doubting.  Our Panthers will keep playing, fighting, and grinding out wins.  Put Tom Brady in our offense.  Put Payton Manning.  Put Russell Wilson here.  We wouldn't be undefeated.  We have a great D, a very underrated QB, and a team that has each other's backs.

Our wins don't generate the clicks of Kaepernick getting benched.  I'll take 7-0.  I'll take our ugly wins over pretty losses.  I think we all would.  The media loves to bash Cam, so the title is correct.  He can't win (with them) so he stopped losing on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, d-dave said:

It's a commentary on the general public's disdain of the Panthers.  We're not the flashy team everyone loves, we're the team that underachieved for the past few years.  We don't have the long term success of New England, the name of Payton Manning,  or the charming nick names of the Seattle Seahawks.  The article says that us and the Bengals are teams that people are watching, but just waiting for them to fold.

Keep watching, keep doubting.  Our Panthers will keep playing, fighting, and grinding out wins.  Put Tom Brady in our offense.  Put Payton Manning.  Put Russell Wilson here.  We wouldn't be undefeated.  We have a great D, a very underrated QB, and a team that has each other's backs.

Our wins don't generate the clicks of Kaepernick getting benched.  I'll take 7-0.  I'll take our ugly wins over pretty losses.  I think we all would.  The media loves to bash Cam, so the title is correct.  He can't win (with them) so he stopped losing on the field.

Couldn't agree more. I actually like the fact that we don't have too many huge names. Seattle won the SB with what some would argue to be no-name talent. New England has a bunch of white-guy slot receivers, and they keep winning. 

When everyone keeps wanting to trade for guys like Calvin Johnson, I cringe a little bit. For teams like Detroit with Calvin, or Minnesota with Adrian Peterson, or Arizona a few years ago when Fitzgerald was an elite guy, those teams don't really have a ton of success. You always end up forcing the ball to these all-stars; but when the other team finally takes them away, you're not left with much.

Just my $.02, but I think that there is something to keeping a balanced roster like ours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CoastalCat said:

Couldn't agree more. I actually like the fact that we don't have too many huge names. Seattle won the SB with what some would argue to be no-name talent. New England has a bunch of white-guy slot receivers, and they keep winning. 

When everyone keeps wanting to trade for guys like Calvin Johnson, I cringe a little bit. For teams like Detroit with Calvin, or Minnesota with Adrian Peterson, or Arizona a few years ago when Fitzgerald was an elite guy, those teams don't really have a ton of success. You always end up forcing the ball to these all-stars; but when the other team finally takes them away, you're not left with much.

Just my $.02, but I think that there is something to keeping a balanced roster like ours. 

When Steve Smith was the best WR in football, how many Super Bowls did we go to?  When he was part of a more complete team, that's when we went to the Super Bowl.  Stars are great, but you need a lot of solid help all around.  We're much closer to that 2003 team than we are to the Steve Smith dependent team of 2005.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The general public is slow on the uptake. They don't understand newly successful teams, and they don't believe in what they don't understand. They don't understand why we're winning, so they have no belief that our team will continue to win. They know next to nothing about the Panthers in the same way that I know next to nothing about the Cleveland Browns.

The media has a bias toward large market teams, and this adds to the ignorance of the general public. Even so called "experts" were picking teams like the Jaguars to defeat us before our long winning streak. Now that we're 7-0 there has to be a negative spin to put down our team. What could possibly be said? Well now you see the latest idea. The NFC is unusually bad this season, and the Panthers are reaping the reward. The Panthers are playing easy teams, and that's why they're winning. What about Seattle? Never mind that. It was luck. The media is pretty worthless and out of touch. If we go 16-0 then the media will trash this team in way we have never seen before. 

The best way to gain the respect of the public is to win the SB, or at least make it to the SB. How we're going to do that with Ginn and Brown I don't know. Cam is going to have to go berserk in the playoffs, and he might do just that with the way our team has been disrespected.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...