Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Refs don't like Greg Olsen


Udogg

Recommended Posts

Honestly... This was a terribly officiated game all the way through. Biggest mistake was the 4th down conversion by the Colts at the end of the 4th. Clear as day it hit the ground even the guy on the broadcast said so (and we all know ESPN is all over the Colts and don't give a rats ass about us so if it wasn't clear as day that guy would be saying "no way this should be overturned").

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Honestly... This was a terribly officiated game all the way through. Biggest mistake was the 4th down conversion by the Colts at the end of the 4th. Clear as day it hit the ground even the guy on the broadcast said so (and we all know ESPN is all over the Colts and don't give a rats ass about us so if it wasn't clear as day that guy would be saying "no way this should be overturned").

even skip fuging bay less said it wasn't a catch. Biggest bs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

idk but both those calls were complete bullshit

When ESPN's own rules expert came on the air and said that the call (4th down catch) will be reversed I started celebrating. And then.. I don't even wanna think about that moment when they upheld that catch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gazi said:

When ESPN's own rules expert came on the air and said that the call (4th down catch) will be reversed I started celebrating. And then.. I don't even wanna think about that moment when they upheld that catch

That ESPN expert is none other than Greensboro's own Gerry Austin. The ball was incomplete though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah refs tonight were poo. Couple colts fans that were sitting in seats that werent even theirs next to me got pissed when I said the refs have to keep it interesting to make it look like Luck isnt garbage. Asked me what our record was last year and then I informed them that their entire division has been a dumpster fire since re-alignment, they really didnt enjoy that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greg definitely draw my eye on a lot of plays because it looks like he's holding or picking players. He's not good at all at hiding it, and the refs end up eyeing him and looking for anything. Imagine if Shaquille O'Neal tried to pick your pocket. That's Olsen trying to get away with something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...