Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Colinsworth


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

From the interception off of Funchess hands, Colinsworth keeps on about that get two first down crap and how our defense is getting worn out. You can tell he is pulling for the Beagles to pull this out.

I want to jump through the TV and tell him to STFU.  Just finished end of 3rd Qtr and all he keeps talking about is how we are tired.

TD with a huge pop.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

really?  I heard him talk about how great Cam is, how great our OGs are, how great it is to see Stewart pound it up the middle and carry the pile for 5 yards, how we are winning with no name WRs, etc, etc, etc.

maybe that's just because I have a positive outlook, though, and that's what stands out to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.... and how long did they go on and on about the "cap" issues ......  it was really, really bad last night.  BUT at the end all that matters is that we won and that we are 6-0

I did not time it, but it seemed like around 2 hours of "Chip Kelly is not a racist, he's just brilliant, even if he can't do math"

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, J Stew is breaking the will of D linemen every other play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

really?  I heard him talk about how great Cam is, how great our OGs are, how great it is to see Stewart pound it up the middle and carry the pile for 5 yards, how we are wining with no name WRs, etc, etc, etc.

maybe that's just because I have a positive outlook, though, and that's what stands out to me.

That's what I heard. He had no problem praising the Panthers. Said multiple times he was enjoying our 'old school' keep pounding offense, and was really talking up Short. 

I've been listening to the guy since he started with Inside the NFL 25 years ago. He's certainly opinionated and I don't always agree with him, but he'll admit when he's wrong. 

The announcing team wasn't totally up to speed on all things Panther wise (didn't know that Brown reclaimed the 'Philly' nickname), but I had no real problem with them. Usually I want to turn the sound off and listen to Panthers radio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I heard. He had no problem praising the Panthers. Said multiple times he was enjoying our 'old school' keep pounding offense, and was really talking up Short. 

I've been listening to the guy since he started with Inside the NFL 25 years ago. He's certainly opinionated and I don't always agree with him, but he'll admit when he's wrong. 

The announcing team wasn't totally up to speed on all things Panther wise (didn't know that Brown reclaimed the 'Philly' nickname), but I had no real problem with them. Usually I want to turn the sound off and listen to Panthers radio.

he had an orgasm over Short.  Said multiple times that he's half way to the probowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...