Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ginn's catch


ncmonzta

Recommended Posts

There was nothing wrong with the call. It's the rule that needs to be changed. If in the referees' judgment the pass catcher is in the process of going to the ground in the act of making the catch he must maintain possession through contact with the ground. That didn't happen here. An odd rule (as it demands subjectivity), but that's the NFL world we live in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought when you have both hands on the ball and u hit the ground, you're down by contact if a defender touches you. 

 

Exhibit A:

panthers-eagles-48.jpg

I think it was just a "too close to call thing". I think that if the initial ruling was a catch, it would have stood. 

PS: I'm not sure his butt is on the ground yet in this photo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never seen anything like this and I have to say that was down by contact. I've seen plenty of players who's butts touched the ground first and they were down by contact. 

 

Martavius Bryants TD a couple of weeks ago when Landry threw him the ball. His Foot landed then his butt landed and they counted that as a TD. Basically the same principle. Except one was for a TD this time it was for a turnover. This has to be the worst turnover I've ever witnessed in my life. The refs are looking more and more like fools each week. There's Always something each week, players won't know what the rules are anymore, how can you expect them too if the refs themselves don't make up their minds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn left his feet to make the catch, therefore he must maintain possession as he goes to the ground.  The ball gets jarred loose as he hits the ground.  It is one of those calvin johnson type plays that is normally called an incompletion.  Only in this case it unfortunately landed in the lap of the eagle.

 

This is what happens when you have rules that state that you can have a post-possession incompletion.  The possibility of a post-possession interception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could easily pick apart yesterday’s game: dropped passes, blown coverages, bad tackling and red zone issues to name a few. But it was clear that this wasn’t the same team from earlier in the season. They fought back and hung with the champs until the end. That’s what I was excited to see and it gives me hope that we’re on the right track.
    • I think BY played well today and exceeded expectations. I will temper future expectations as he has to string together many games of consistent quality. One game doesn’t convince me that he is a franchise QB or even a guy you want to stick with for another season. One game doesn’t erase all the negative play and limitations from the past couple of years. I hope he balls out and continues to get better but for me the verdict is still out   That said, I think he gave the team and fans hope yesterday which is a lot more than what we had when we woke up Sunday morning. 
    • He was vastly improved today and we need to see more of Bryce the rest of the season to continue evaluate him in order to decide what the heck to do with him at the end of the season. He must play at least like this and improve more from here the rest of the season in order for me to keep him. No more 123 yard passing games and want to see at least this output weekly from him. If this is Bruce improving slowly over time then Canales is even better with developing QB's than I thought he was but still too early to tell and we need to see him the rest of the way as he has at very least earned back the starting gig moving forward.
×
×
  • Create New...