If we can beat Mr 92% Luke Mccown then I feel good about Rodgers

[PanthersUnited]

I know you are probably thinking I have gone off the deep end finally even mentioning Mccown and Rodgers in the same sentence. Make no mistake, I am in no way, shape or form saying Mccown is anywhere near close to as good as Rodgers even on Rodgers worst day BUT just for the one game when he played us, he did look like Aaron Rodgers completing a whopping 92% of his passes against us.. 92%! Hell come to think of it, Rodgers hasn't even had a completion % that high.

Keep in mind also that the Saints game is the closest thing we saw that resembles the pass heavy Packers offense this year. And while Mccown is no Rodgers, for that one game he played us he sure as hell looked like Rodgers.

Thats the tape this team needs to watch over and over again because as bat poo crazy as it sounds, out of all the QBs we played this season, Luke Mccown by far had the best performance. 

If we can beat a pass heavy offense and a QB that looked efficient and poised like Mccown did against us, a QB that completed 92% of his passes, then I at least feel ok about Rodgers. Now grant it, you can make the argument that "Rodgers wouldn't have thrown that late pick." Maybe, maybe not but then again if Rodgers threw to Josh Norman then maybe he does throw that pick.

[Panther_Brotherhood]

thats funny, I thought we played the Colts next

[Sam Mills Fan]

[L-TownCat]

[htown704]

We play the Colts next.  I dont care about GB right now...

[mrford]

[GhostP.]

Why the hell did I click on this ..

[ItsNotGonnaBeAlright]

[Khyber53]

First, we've got Andrew Luck, and no matter how bad the Colts look this year, he'll be the best QB we've faced so far.

 

And wouldn't it be much, much better to watch game tapes of Green Bay rather than revisit McCown's Big Adventure?

[MCC]

I don't understand....

[chknwing]

ok another shitty thread by PU, this is for those that regret coming here,

[JccOldTime23]

Are you seriously saying you're not worried about the best quarterback in the entire league because we beat a bad Saints team with their backup quarterback?

[The Lobo]

I know you are probably thinking I have gone off the deep end finally even mentioning Mccown and Rodgers in the same sentence. Make no mistake, I am in no way, shape or form saying Mccown is anywhere near close to as good as Rodgers even on Rodgers worst day BUT just for the one game when he played us, he did look like Aaron Rodgers completing a whopping 92% of his passes against us.. 92%! Hell come to think of it, Rodgers hasn't even had a completion % that high.

Keep in mind also that the Saints game is the closest thing we saw that resembles the pass heavy Packers offense this year. And while Mccown is no Rodgers, for that one game he played us he sure as hell looked like Rodgers.

Thats the tape this team needs to watch over and over again because as bat poo crazy as it sounds, out of all the QBs we played this season, Luke Mccown by far had the best performance. 

If we can beat a pass heavy offense and a QB that looked efficient and poised like Mccown did against us, a QB that completed 92% of his passes, then I at least feel ok about Rodgers. Now grant it, you can make the argument that "Rodgers wouldn't have thrown that late pick." Maybe, maybe not but then again if Rodgers threw to Josh Norman then maybe he does throw that pick.

I don't mind your posts, but please stop looking past Indy. They are a tough team who never quits. They will  play us tough...one week at a time, sir

[ncsu12engr]

McCown got that high percentage by mostly dumping it down to a rb or a te check down. He rarely threw the ball down the field. Rodgers won't be doing that. Also, we play Andrew Luck next week, so let's focus on him and talk about Aaron after that game is over.