Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's look at the remaining schedule and forecast how we finish


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

that's like saying because of the panthers' pathetic record after coming off a bye and heartbreaking series record against the seahawks that there's no way in hell the panthers would ever beat the seahawks after coming off a bye.

oh...wait.

Not trying to get an endless argument going. We're both working with incomplete information. You guys are using information from games played this year not against the Cowboys, and I'm using games against the Cowboys not played this year. We'll have to just see how it plays out. Go Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure we beat Atlanta both times, I think we could split that, because that is how division games go.  Same with Saints.  Tampa we beat though.  Green Bay will rough and Cowboys, if Romo is back, will get hefty ref help.   I think 12-4 is a real solid possibility.   I still feel 11-5 may be more in line though, and we may lose one of those games we shouldn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On September 8th, I made a season projection with scores. I will put it in here. I predicted 14-2 then, I hold to that now.
 

@ Jags - W 28-10

Texans - W (20-14)

Saints - W (24-13)

@ Bucs - W (35-10)

@ Seahawks - W (38-21)

Eagles - W (34-20)

Colts - W (impressively too. Like, 31-10)

Packers - L (will be close, but only because our defense keeps it low scoring. 17-7)

@ Titans - W (21-3)

Redskins - W (27-14)

@ Cowboys - W (34-17)

@ Saints - L (think we go in over-confident after winning on Thanksgiving. 28-13)

Falcons - W (35-10)

@ Giants - W (17-14)

@ Falcons - W (20-3)

Bucs - W (21-7)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we have a shot at 14-2 with the Bucs the only thing standing in the way there's no way we rest the starters in that scenario because we'd likely be playing for the #1 seed. It'll realistically take 14-2 to win homefield advantage, unless we beat the Packers in 2 weeks, in which case tying with them at 13-3 could do it with the tie-breaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...