Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Panthers victory over Seattle means nothing"

heelinfine

By heelinfine,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Frank Hollywood Newbie

Frank Hollywood

Posted
Posted

This is so awesome.  I feel bad for any of you that get angry reading that. Some assclown diehard Seahawks reporter in Washington state just dedicated an entire article to a team from North Carolina. 

Why?

Because they got their ass handed to them and I guarantee the little hipster macklemore look-a-like cried in his Starbucks coffee this morning thinking of what to write to try and make the hurt go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Rookie

teeray

Posted
Posted

This is so awesome.  I feel bad for any of you that get angry reading that. Some assclown diehard Seahawks reporter in Washington state just dedicated an entire article to a team from North Carolina. 

Why?

Because they got their ass handed to them and I guarantee the little hipster macklemore look-a-like cried in his Starbucks coffee this morning thinking of what to write to try and make the hurt go away.

Washington Post buddy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted

This is so awesome.  I feel bad for any of you that get angry reading that. Some assclown diehard Seahawks reporter in Washington state just dedicated an entire article to a team from North Carolina. 

Why?

Because they got their ass handed to them and I guarantee the little hipster macklemore look-a-like cried in his Starbucks coffee this morning thinking of what to write to try and make the hurt go away.

Yeah, that would be the DC version of Washington.  But thats ok, we know what you meant.  And I for one support it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

 

Ah good catch. I still think his use of that "rating system" shows a serious bias and hatred against a good Panthers team. He's either a closet Seahawks fan or is so embarassed of his beloved Redskins this season he needs to spread the hate.

Or just a guy with a sportswriting job but no real football knowledge trying to sound like he knows what he's talking about (and proving the exact opposite).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted

Panther victories don't mean anything to a large portion of the national media. Just look at how hard they work to dig through stats to find negative things to say about our team. You can go stat hunting to attack any team in the NFL. There is no team that is immune to negative comments based on various stats. You can always go that direction and make an attack on any team in the NFL. Then turn around and say the stats are impartial and that you don't have a dog in the fight, and that you're just being objective.

So he has found a stat that shows the Redskins are better than the Panthers? Could that be because I'm reading this on the WASHINGTONpost.com? The anti-Panther bias in the media is stronger with our team than any other team in the NFL. Even the lowly Jaguars receive more positive articles. It's unreal. Any time a sports writer sits down at their desk they have the choice of writing a positive, negative, or neutral article. It's wide open. The Panthers are __________. This guy chose "The Panthers are just an average team at best and their wins don't mean sh!t. Look at all the stats I found!" fug that guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted

Narrative before Seattle game: "Panthers won't win in Seattle. This will show just how frauds they are"

Narrative after we beat them: "Seattle just aren't what they used to be"

LOL I love how everybody backtracks everytime we beat them. Eagles will be the next team we send to irrelevancy. I also love how nobody wants to bring up who the Broncos and Packers have beaten (absolutely nobody), yet they are legit and we aren't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...