Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade for Sammy Watkins?


RealTalk

Recommended Posts

We haven't had two quality WR in over a decade and we got a lot of Gems in later rounds lately.

We already have a #1 and a high round pick who still has plenty of potential to be a quality guy. 

Trading what it would take to get a guy like Watkins means giving up on Funchess only four games in.

Throw in that Ginn is off to the best start of his career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We already have a #1 and a high round pick who still has plenty of potential to be a quality guy. 

Trading what it would take to get a guy like Watkins means giving up on Funchess only four games in.

Throw in that Ginn is off to the best start of his career. 

And still dropping a bunch of balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're going after a Clemson WR with dreads, I'd rather have Nuk.

yeah, Nuk was the better WR even at Clemson.  Sammy the more versatile player.  Pure WR Nuk was better even at Clemson.

I take Watson any day though.  He would pretty much solve our WR and return game issue for the next several years.

and by solve the WR issue I mean be the compliment to the big guys who aren't field stretchers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We already have a #1 and a high round pick who still has plenty of potential to be a quality guy. 

Trading what it would take to get a guy like Watkins means giving up on Funchess only four games in.

Throw in that Ginn is off to the best start of his career. 

why would that be giving up on Funchess? 

Ginn is getting old and a vet band-aid.

Elite offenses have lots of talent.  Not just one or maybe 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...