Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What I would like to see


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

I, like most of you, am very happy be 4-0 heading into the bye week.  Many predicted less.  Now we come to the test that will show who we are.

I personally see us heading into Green Bay 7-0 and our game being the Game of the Week. 

Seattle, WE SHOULD BEAT.  Our defense is as tough as theirs and we got a chip.  Jimmy Graham is pooing his pants because Thomas Davis is going spend a couple hours knocking the crap out of him.  (I have never seen a player react as to an individual player as I have seen Graham act towards TD) Anyhow, 12 man or not.  We should win this game.

Philly isn't as daunting as they we when the schedule came out.  Film is out on this this style and IMO Chip Kelly is losing his locker room already.

Indy,  I hope the interception machine plays and Cam outshines him because I cannot stand the Luck hype and the Colts are not that good either.

7-0 going into a home game with GB.  BOA Stadium will rock.

Now to my topic.

I would like to see our running game get more than 2 yds a carry. (not including Cam)  Seems the majority of our runs are less than 2 yard.  Which takes me to my second point. 

WR keep stepping up.   It is good to see Bersin getting passes and Ginn making plays but I would like to see us get Funchess online.  I would take an early play and get Funchess the ball.  Let him shake the Jitters and hopefully get him in the groove as we face these better teams.

Defense tight up.  I know Luke has been out but we seem so blah.  Hopefully, Luke is back in time for Seattle because he is going to be a difference maker.  Klien is solid and our defense is good with him a MLB. But Carolina Sports the best MLB in the game and he changes our defense from good to great.  

Finally,  Special Teams don't put us in a bind.  NO more put returns and no more blocked FGs.   We might need those points against our next opponents. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the confidence in this thread but over looking opponents is not a good idea.  Seattle in Seattle is a problem by itself. Let's take it one game at a time folks. 

Not at all over looking anyone.  My point is we should beat those teams.  Though we have things we need to fix  (part two of the OP) we are good enough to beat these guys.  Seattle, Philly and Indy have not shown me anything that would make be think they are better than us.

Yes we are going to Seattle and they got the 12th man. Got it.  Our defense is going to make things rough on Wilson.  Outside of divisional opponents we have face the Seahawks more than anyone else.  We know them well.   Time to come up with a W.   I don't believe this is overlooking Seattle.  Overlooking Seattle is saying this game is a Lock.

Philly is spiraling out of control and by week 7 they may be done.  They  have traded all their talent away, the talent they brought in they don't use.  This is a very winnable game and if we play smart Panther football we should win.

Finally, Indy.  I think this will be tough but Indy line is terrible.  Their running game scares no one and Luck will throw Picks. Winnable game.

Are these LOCK games, not a chance.  Should we win, Yes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...