Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Not panthers related but IDGAF...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

They're putting a dog down in Austin for biting a kid that grabbed it from behind at a pet-adoption event after the staff told the parents not to let their kid into the pen with the dogs.  Ramming police with your car and generally losing your mind seems more severe than that, so, can we consider the death penalty for this woman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FYI, she met all 3 sides of the triangle required by international law for use of deadly force. That doesn't mean the cops MUST use deadly force but they would have been justified if they had.

Intent - purposely ramming a car into another car.

Capability - Driving a car.

Opportunity - She was in the position to strike people in their cars as well as people out of their cars including an officer (assuming his narration was accurate and she actually almost hit the cop.)

I've been in a situation where I had to use my judgement on if I should fire or not. In this situation, I would have been more aggressive in apprehending her but probably wouldn't have pulled the trigger. It's pretty obvious the cop did not fear for his life at any moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FYI, she met all 3 sides of the triangle required by international law for use of deadly force. That doesn't mean the cops MUST use deadly force but they would have been justified if they had.

Sub 'crucified' for justified. She wasn't driving fast enough and clearly had no intent to hit anyone on foot. There were plenty of pedestrians around if she'd wanted to run over someone. It was plain that she just wanted to play low speed bumper cars and drive around in a circle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize we were down 24 points when the Carolina Panthers touched the ball  for the first and only time  in the 3rd quarter...and they went on a 14 play checkdown drive taking the exact plays the Cards wanted them too and gave them overall.  and now you got folks cherry picking random plays asking how could it be garbage time if the Cards weren't in prevent on a 3rd down short yardage play or on the goal.  all you got do to is just watch the game live on repeat and not listen to the announcers.  
    • Just my opinion, so take it for what it's worth. I think Bryce decides who he's throwing to before the snap too often instead of reading what he sees post snap. Now alot of that is trying to influence the safety, but if the safety doesn't bite, he gets stuck and it turns into Bryce trying to make a play off schedule as the other options are gone. Cam did the same thing when Kelvin and Smitty were in the game. Bryce sees the field. He just gets a little stubborn sometimes. And that's when he gets himself into trouble. That and he doesn't trust guys to make plays on 3rd down. Instead of throwing to the open guy and letting them get the remaining 3-5 yards for the first, he'll wait until he can throw a guy to the markers. I don't think those physical limitations that keep being brought up is that real for him. Well... until he gets tackled and fumbles the ball at an alarming rate. But he has a strong enough arm, sees the field, and doesn't get injured by regular hits. 
    • Panthers win of course.  Like every Sunday I still have the hopelessly optimistic mindset  😎  
×
×
  • Create New...