Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is hindering the running game?


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

Here are my top 4 reasons the running game isn't so hot this year:

 

1. We're not a smashmouth running team anymore. We don't batter down the opponent's shield wall and push the pile forward anymore. We're not a passing team, either. We're a mobile quarterback/option team. Our playbook leans very heavily on "What can we do with Cam on every down?"

Our rushing game doesn't open up because of the threat of passing, our passing doesn't open up because of play action. It is all based on the defense trying to figure out Cam's prestidigitation before the snap. Will Cam keep the ball in the option or will he let Stewie take off with it? Will he pass it downfield or will he dart through the defense for 10 yards?

Really, if Cam wasn't such an amazing athlete, we'd be incredibly one dimensional. We just have to be very careful not to tip our hand by setting up tendencies in each situation. 2 and 8, Cam always does this. 3 and 1, Cam always keeps it. The good teams watch this like a hawk to pick apart teams like ours. We used to do it to shut down Mike Vick. We had him dead to rights and Thomas Davis spied him for the whole game to keep him pretty much in handcuffs.

2. An O-line typically either pass blocks or run blocks on a down. But if you rely on the read option a lot, the line has to hybridize its blocking to provide a bit of each or the play is lost. The problem is, you really can't do both well at the same time. Our read option plays are becoming less and less effective, partly because of this and partly because Stewie doesn't get the full benefit of dedicated run blocking. And let's face it, Cam keeps it most of the time.

3. No one fears our passing game too much. A bit, but most teams figure watch out for Olsen and you should be able to cover the rest with basic defensive play calling. They can afford to stack the box. We're stronger on this than our opponents think (check that 4-0 record), but the better teams will be able to handle our receivers without too much stress.

4. Stewie really, really benefited from DeAngelo Williams. It's not popular to say it, but we've gone from giving defenses Double Trouble to giving them Not Much Trouble At All. Those two guys didn't just feed off of each other, but they punished defenders. The defenders' legs would tire out chasing DWill down the line and then Stewie would just beat the crap out of them. DWill could lay a good hit on a defender, almost as good as Stewart. Now, Cam is the guy they have to chase, but none us want to see him duck his helmet and deliver a blow like an RB does. DWill got too expensive, and there was obviously some stuff behind the scenes, so he wasn't going to stay. This year, Stewie is mighty expensive, and he's not exactly putting up stats worthy of those paychecks. And don't get me started on why Fozzy hasn't been even close to a DWill replacement.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming KB being missing plays a part in terms of how teams are playing against us? 

Also, does Stew need to play his way into the season?  His average yards per carry has gone up every game this season...

JAX  3.1, 

HOU  3.6, 

NO   3.7,

Tampa  5.0

It would be interesting to see how Stewart's yards per carry figures evolved last season.  I know he was a beast at season's end...

He always tend to get better as the season goes. I looked at the stats in an older thread and he improves by an average of 1 or 1.5 YPC in the second half of seasons as compared to the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it strange that we almost never do toss plays , if its not the occasional read option ish thing, then its a very straitforward run up the gut with stewart. Sometimes RBs can break big runs when they have more space to maneuver in the toss plays.

I don't think Stewart is running particularly badly, I think he has A) Really shitty blocking, always see him having to fight through multiple defenders  B) repetitive and predictable run play calls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was looking at some of Football Outsiders' stats and their table re: our OLine.   Our run blocking ranks 21st by their calculations.  Our POWER run game (which includes Cam) is however, ranked 4th.  Interesting....

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol

 

The problem is that with offensive line stats, there are so many subjective factors that the stats don't really reflect the truth sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that with offensive line stats, there are so many subjective factors that the stats don't really reflect the truth sometimes.

That makes sense, after all, PFF ranks our OLine 2nd at the moment... so obviously, it's not an exact science! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...