Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bersin four catches for 54 yds


Jmac

Recommended Posts

For everyone that shat on this guy and wrote him off. All he does is catch the ball and move the chains. Credit to B.B for being the possession guy that they need.....Dependable and sure handed. If he does go back to the PS, just a matter of time before someone swipes him up. Good job today for making the plays and keeping drives alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to agree with you, but my limited observation in games seems to lead me to think less of him in the "reliability" department. He does seem to find a crucial play when you really need it, and I think he is smart, and very cool headed. Which I like. I think he deserves a spot on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a big voice for him getting reps over Norwood.  If Norwood can't produce high now, there is no use in keeping him on the active roster with Cotchery being out.  That said, I'm not sure we sit him even if Cotch returns.  When's the last time Cotch had 54 yards in a game??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize he's not a Pro Bowler, but he catches the ball consistently. I don't understand all the low ceiling stuff. How is anyone on this forum qualified to say that or know that. I'm greatful no one looked at me early in my career and just decided he can only go so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4-0 everything is good. We had some issues with receivers getting off the line and creating separation against Seattle in the playoffs.

Love what the receivers have done up to this point but it only gets tougher. That said Bersin seems years ahead of the guy from Seattle we got and the guy we drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...