Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

KK to be Great


Recommended Posts

Nice article on KK.  I think he can be great.

 

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/tom-sorensen/article37415526.html

Interesting situation approaching.  Two young star quality DTs.  Yeah, Yeah, Yeah Gettleman is going to do his magic and keep both but for just for argument.

 You can only keep one.  Do you keep Star or do you Keep Short?

For me.  Short would get the nod just because he seems to be on the floor longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will keep Short as he will still be cheaper to resign than Star based on his draft position. As for Star, let's see what he does this year and next. Hard to say which will be better by the time we have to resign them.

Draft position after the fact has nothing to do with who will be paid more after the rookie deal. 

Whoever played better on the field will be getting paid more. 

Short was a massive steal in the draft. Easily the best pass rushing DT in that draft. Dumb ass GM's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We made the mistake with Witherspoon and Morgan, I hope we don't do it again!

Spoon wanted the money dude.  He left Carolina because he thought he could be a mike and get paid mike money elsewhere (which he did).

 

It would have been a mistake to have kept Spoon IMO at the price it would have taken. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Star is underrated when compared to Short by many Panther fans.  Too many only notice the flash,  but fail to realize that it's Star pushing the pocket taking up multiple blockers.  Much of the flash everyone likes is because of the unflashy work Star does.

Both Star and Short are vital to our defense.  Our defense starts with the front seven, so if Gettleman has to make a future cap choice, he'll pass on signing Norman to make sure he has the space to sign both DT's.  So, I have no doubts that Gettleman will get both signed, we can easily stagger the big cap hits.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...