Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Winning The Close One


KendrickPanther

Recommended Posts

In the first two years of Ron Rivera's tenure he took a great deal of criticism for not being able to pull out close wins. We lost 13 times in 1 score games. In the next two seasons we lost 4 of them and none in 2015 thus far. He's taken some credit for turning that around. I have a different take on it. Ron has made small strides from a game management perspective. However our personnel has made large leaps in Football IQ/Experience.

In the past 4 seasons the average age of our roster has climbed from 25.7 to 26.8.

The average years experience has climbed from 2.8 to 4.8.

It's not just that our players are growing up. We've inserted battle tested veterans in each position group to help with the process. Whether it's Ryan Kalil, Roman Harper, Jerrico Cotchery, or Charles Tillman, we've added veteran savvy. Right now 2nd year Defensive End Kony Ealy has been a liability in crunch time. We've gone out and picked up another battle tested veteran in Jarred Allen. Not because he has tons of upside, because we can count on him to do the right things when the game is in the balance.

Ron Rivera hasn't really made sweeping changes in his coaching style, he just has the personnel to execute it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do like that we're winning, but we're incredibly close to being 1-2. I don't like the trend of "Carry small lead into the 4th quarter. Score touchdown. Think game is over now that lead is up to double digits. Go into soft defense, opponent scores touchdown. We go 3 & out. Hold on for dear life as opponent drives with under 2 minutes left." 

 

This has been going on ALL the time under Rivera. Thankfully, we've gotten better at the holding on for dear life part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now if we can just get someone to hide his challenge flag...

his challenging skills have been fine so far this year, for the most part.  he was right to challenge both of the ones he did against NO, not his fault the refs are blind, deaf and dumb.  I don't think I've disagreed with any of his challenges this year.  His clock management and decision making to end halves though....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do like that we're winning, but we're incredibly close to being 1-2. I don't like the trend of "Carry small lead into the 4th quarter. Score touchdown. Think game is over now that lead is up to double digits. Go into soft defense, opponent scores touchdown. We go 3 & out. Hold on for dear life as opponent drives with under 2 minutes left." 

 

This has been going on ALL the time under Rivera. Thankfully, we've gotten better at the holding on for dear life part.

a fuging men

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean it's not even like this was his worst game of the season... I'm not done with him by any means but this feels more the norm for him than the exception:/
    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
×
×
  • Create New...