Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Winning The Close One


KendrickPanther

Recommended Posts

In the first two years of Ron Rivera's tenure he took a great deal of criticism for not being able to pull out close wins. We lost 13 times in 1 score games. In the next two seasons we lost 4 of them and none in 2015 thus far. He's taken some credit for turning that around. I have a different take on it. Ron has made small strides from a game management perspective. However our personnel has made large leaps in Football IQ/Experience.

In the past 4 seasons the average age of our roster has climbed from 25.7 to 26.8.

The average years experience has climbed from 2.8 to 4.8.

It's not just that our players are growing up. We've inserted battle tested veterans in each position group to help with the process. Whether it's Ryan Kalil, Roman Harper, Jerrico Cotchery, or Charles Tillman, we've added veteran savvy. Right now 2nd year Defensive End Kony Ealy has been a liability in crunch time. We've gone out and picked up another battle tested veteran in Jarred Allen. Not because he has tons of upside, because we can count on him to do the right things when the game is in the balance.

Ron Rivera hasn't really made sweeping changes in his coaching style, he just has the personnel to execute it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do like that we're winning, but we're incredibly close to being 1-2. I don't like the trend of "Carry small lead into the 4th quarter. Score touchdown. Think game is over now that lead is up to double digits. Go into soft defense, opponent scores touchdown. We go 3 & out. Hold on for dear life as opponent drives with under 2 minutes left." 

 

This has been going on ALL the time under Rivera. Thankfully, we've gotten better at the holding on for dear life part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now if we can just get someone to hide his challenge flag...

his challenging skills have been fine so far this year, for the most part.  he was right to challenge both of the ones he did against NO, not his fault the refs are blind, deaf and dumb.  I don't think I've disagreed with any of his challenges this year.  His clock management and decision making to end halves though....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do like that we're winning, but we're incredibly close to being 1-2. I don't like the trend of "Carry small lead into the 4th quarter. Score touchdown. Think game is over now that lead is up to double digits. Go into soft defense, opponent scores touchdown. We go 3 & out. Hold on for dear life as opponent drives with under 2 minutes left." 

 

This has been going on ALL the time under Rivera. Thankfully, we've gotten better at the holding on for dear life part.

a fuging men

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...