Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speculation....when will they pay 24

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jmac Grand Master

Jmac

Posted
Posted

The Franchise tag on a corner will be approx. 13 millon. Norman was offered 7 millon or so during the offseason and didn't bite. He will be tested again this weekend with some pretty good recievers on the Bucs and some top wideouts in the weeks to come. With the bye week coming, will D.G break his no contract credo during the season to fatten the deal? Will ten millon get the deal done and save the cap hIt a big tag for only one year will bring. 

It's pretty obvious the guy is the real deal and should be retained. Will "the Godfather" break his own policy to get this done? Yes or no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nosuchthingasapanther Explorer

nosuchthingasapanther

Posted
Posted

The Franchise tag on a corner will be approx. 13 millon. Norman was offered 7 millon or so during the offseason and didn't bite. He will be tested again this weekend with some pretty good recievers on the Bucs and some top wideouts in the weeks to come. With the bye week coming, will D.G break his no contract credo during the season to fatten the deal? Will ten millon get the deal done and save the cap hIt a big tag for only one year will bring. 

It's pretty obvious the guy is the real deal and should be retained. Will "the Godfather" break his own policy to get this done? Yes or no.

no.

godfathers don't become godfathers by changing their own philosophies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the butch Newbie

the butch

Posted
Posted

Being stubborn isn't good business sense, and DG has good business sense.  I wouldn't be surprised at all to see him break his "rule."  

 

That said, I don't know if a bigger deal is coming.  DG's and Ron's philosophy is pay the DLine.  If there is a DE out there that is looking to get paid, DG will take that Norman money and put it there, and then just draft a CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bartin Collaborator

Bartin

Posted
Posted

It's pretty obvious the guy is the real deal and should be retained. Will "the Godfather" break his own policy to get this done? Yes or no.

It would be a really bad idea to try and sign him right now. He'll(rightfully after his first 3 games) think he deserves Revis money.

Also, I hope that when a deal gets done that his age is properly accounted for. I'd rather we give him $36M/3 than $50M/5. CB's tend to fall off a cliff after 30 and once they've lost it, they never get it back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pox 08 Newbie

Pox 08

Posted
Posted

I think $11M-$12M/yr would lock Norman up now.              If Norman continues to be a force for our defense,  as the season progresses,  I don't think he will be a Panther next year.      I don't think we franchise tag him. 

 

  If Norman ends the season as a top 5 DB in the league,  and he is allowed to test FA,  there is no way in hell we're going to match some of the offers he'll get from more desperate teams with a ton of cap space.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SetfreexX Experienced

SetfreexX

Posted
Posted

Being stubborn isn't good business sense, and DG has good business sense.  I wouldn't be surprised at all to see him break his "rule."  

 

That said, I don't know if a bigger deal is coming.  DG's and Ron's philosophy is pay the DLine.  If there is a DE out there that is looking to get paid, DG will take that Norman money and put it there, and then just draft a CB.

Can't say I buy this as there have been no examples of paying the D-Line to date. 

We can only glean so much from the Hardy tag, but aside from that there is no pattern, or reference that says their stance is to pay the DL. 

Your comment of if there is a DE out there that they'd break the bank on him goes against a already defined pattern of acquiring guys via the draft and grooming them to the teams culture. 

We haven't brought in any high end free agents, and I doubt that changes with contracts on the horizon for Star (5th year option), Short, and most recently Norman. 

If anything I'd bet we tag Norman and look at a DB early the next two drafts if one fits the BPA we've stuck to under Gettleman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the butch Newbie

the butch

Posted
Posted

Can't say I buy this as there have been no examples of paying the D-Line to date. 

We can only glean so much from the Hardy tag, but aside from that there is no pattern, or reference that says their stance is to pay the DL. 

Your comment of if there is a DE out there that they'd break the bank on him goes against a already defined pattern of acquiring guys via the draft and grooming them to the teams culture. 

We haven't brought in any high end free agents, and I doubt that changes with contracts on the horizon for Star (5th year option), Short, and most recently Norman. 

If anything I'd bet we tag Norman and look at a DB early the next two drafts if one fits the BPA we've stuck to under Gettleman. 

We haven't gone the opposite direction, either.  All the rhetoric to this point has been build the front line.  As to the no free agent acquisitions, well, we haven't had any money to do so--see all the "bargain shopping" threads.  Until they say or do otherwise, I can only operate off what they have said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...