Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speculation....when will they pay 24

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jmac Grand Master

Jmac

Posted
Posted

The Franchise tag on a corner will be approx. 13 millon. Norman was offered 7 millon or so during the offseason and didn't bite. He will be tested again this weekend with some pretty good recievers on the Bucs and some top wideouts in the weeks to come. With the bye week coming, will D.G break his no contract credo during the season to fatten the deal? Will ten millon get the deal done and save the cap hIt a big tag for only one year will bring. 

It's pretty obvious the guy is the real deal and should be retained. Will "the Godfather" break his own policy to get this done? Yes or no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nosuchthingasapanther Explorer

nosuchthingasapanther

Posted
Posted

The Franchise tag on a corner will be approx. 13 millon. Norman was offered 7 millon or so during the offseason and didn't bite. He will be tested again this weekend with some pretty good recievers on the Bucs and some top wideouts in the weeks to come. With the bye week coming, will D.G break his no contract credo during the season to fatten the deal? Will ten millon get the deal done and save the cap hIt a big tag for only one year will bring. 

It's pretty obvious the guy is the real deal and should be retained. Will "the Godfather" break his own policy to get this done? Yes or no.

no.

godfathers don't become godfathers by changing their own philosophies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the butch Newbie

the butch

Posted
Posted

Being stubborn isn't good business sense, and DG has good business sense.  I wouldn't be surprised at all to see him break his "rule."  

 

That said, I don't know if a bigger deal is coming.  DG's and Ron's philosophy is pay the DLine.  If there is a DE out there that is looking to get paid, DG will take that Norman money and put it there, and then just draft a CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bartin Collaborator

Bartin

Posted
Posted

It's pretty obvious the guy is the real deal and should be retained. Will "the Godfather" break his own policy to get this done? Yes or no.

It would be a really bad idea to try and sign him right now. He'll(rightfully after his first 3 games) think he deserves Revis money.

Also, I hope that when a deal gets done that his age is properly accounted for. I'd rather we give him $36M/3 than $50M/5. CB's tend to fall off a cliff after 30 and once they've lost it, they never get it back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pox 08 Newbie

Pox 08

Posted
Posted

I think $11M-$12M/yr would lock Norman up now.              If Norman continues to be a force for our defense,  as the season progresses,  I don't think he will be a Panther next year.      I don't think we franchise tag him. 

 

  If Norman ends the season as a top 5 DB in the league,  and he is allowed to test FA,  there is no way in hell we're going to match some of the offers he'll get from more desperate teams with a ton of cap space.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SetfreexX Experienced

SetfreexX

Posted
Posted

Being stubborn isn't good business sense, and DG has good business sense.  I wouldn't be surprised at all to see him break his "rule."  

 

That said, I don't know if a bigger deal is coming.  DG's and Ron's philosophy is pay the DLine.  If there is a DE out there that is looking to get paid, DG will take that Norman money and put it there, and then just draft a CB.

Can't say I buy this as there have been no examples of paying the D-Line to date. 

We can only glean so much from the Hardy tag, but aside from that there is no pattern, or reference that says their stance is to pay the DL. 

Your comment of if there is a DE out there that they'd break the bank on him goes against a already defined pattern of acquiring guys via the draft and grooming them to the teams culture. 

We haven't brought in any high end free agents, and I doubt that changes with contracts on the horizon for Star (5th year option), Short, and most recently Norman. 

If anything I'd bet we tag Norman and look at a DB early the next two drafts if one fits the BPA we've stuck to under Gettleman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the butch Newbie

the butch

Posted
Posted

Can't say I buy this as there have been no examples of paying the D-Line to date. 

We can only glean so much from the Hardy tag, but aside from that there is no pattern, or reference that says their stance is to pay the DL. 

Your comment of if there is a DE out there that they'd break the bank on him goes against a already defined pattern of acquiring guys via the draft and grooming them to the teams culture. 

We haven't brought in any high end free agents, and I doubt that changes with contracts on the horizon for Star (5th year option), Short, and most recently Norman. 

If anything I'd bet we tag Norman and look at a DB early the next two drafts if one fits the BPA we've stuck to under Gettleman. 

We haven't gone the opposite direction, either.  All the rhetoric to this point has been build the front line.  As to the no free agent acquisitions, well, we haven't had any money to do so--see all the "bargain shopping" threads.  Until they say or do otherwise, I can only operate off what they have said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Waldo
      Early NFL offseason chatter

      By Waldo · Posted

      Am I the only one that didn't like either at the time and thinks it's funny they are all being humiliated by this 10 years later? Incognito threatened to steal his father's head from a funeral home? It's a fight between to crazy mofos and neither are likable people. Jerry springer level energy lol. Also Martin will just hide behind CTE if sued. He has always been unstable so good luck proving his words come from any place stable. And Ingognito would be a hard client to represent because the chances of him going off the rails in a trail would be almost guaranteed. What a poo show.  
    • Stingray3030
      Who Has to Be Off the Board to Trade Back?

      By Stingray3030 · Posted

      I am fully OK with smart trade downs - especially when you have as many needs as we do.  And don't sell our defense short - we weren't just the worst in Panther's history - we were the NFL worst OF ALL TIME!  And we seem to do alot better picking defensive players in the top 3 rounds than offense, so maybe we have a chance!
    • SCO96
      Who Has to Be Off the Board to Trade Back?

      By SCO96 · Posted

      I'm against trading down. I'm in favor of staying put and picking the best defensive player/contributor for our woeful defense. However, if we could move down only 4 spots in round 1, come away with a midround 2nd round pick, and only have to give up a 4th round pick (which we'd probably use to pick a JAG), then I could actually stomach that.  That would give us 4 picks in the top 100 instead of 3! If we can't find 3 starters with a first round pick, two 2nd rounders, and high 3rd round choice for the worst defense in Panther's history, then it's time to get a new GM.
×
×
  • Create New...