Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After the bye...predictions on the upcoming storm


Jmac

Recommended Posts

How about some HONEST input on how YOU think this team will fare after the bye. Seattle, Eagles,  Colts. And Packers. After that the Falcons twice. Every game besides these are never a given with our beloved Panthers. Now that you have a three game sample of what we have and the injuries that have befallen us.....what do you think?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We always play Seattle close. The only game I honestly consider a guaranteed loss is the Packers. A slow start against GB puts us down 14-21 points, and we are not coming back from that. I feel we match up pretty well with the others. If we do not start getting some pressure on the QB though we are in trouble. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if carolina can get the pass rush fixed during the bye week, they could win more than we expect.  Carolina has always been a 2nd half team in games and in season.  I think they split with atl, beat the eagles and colts, again lose to seattle, and get completly dismantled by greenbay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could legitimately lose like 4 in a row.   You're looking at a team built on defense that probably would have lost to a backup QB in Luke McCown if Norman didn't bail them out.    The offense isn't built to come back in games and Rodgers and everyone is going to look at the tap and crush us.  The dime and dunk offense has worked on this team over a decade more, across multiple coaches staffs, I'm surprised EVERYONE doesn't do it.  Having Luke back (if he is) will help tremendously though on that however. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more hopeful than I was at the beginning of the season.

Seattle & Indy look beatable.

GreenBay probably our toughest game of the regular season.

Philly is a tough matchup for us, I think, even though they look to have problems.

If, as expected, we go into the Bye at 4 - 0, I think we can come out of the next 4 games at 6 - 2 or at worst 5 - 3.  I don't think we'll lose all 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Seattle - based on recent history, I'm conditioned to think we cannot beat them no matter what, and add that the game is in their house, it seems even less likely.  But we will win against the Eagles and Colts, and fall to GB (our only home loss of the season).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly see us at 7-1. We are due to beat Seattle this year. Mark it down. I feel like it's destiny. You know Cam wants to win that game bad. If we make the Eagles and Colts play our style of football at home those games are very winnable. I'll take Cam in the 4th quarter of a close game at home on prime time every time. Those two games could go either way I just hope the ball bounces our way. I have us 7-0 then falling to Green Bay.

This is assuming we start getting some pressure on the qb. We could just as easily be 5-3 or even 4-4 if we let those guys sit back there all day.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...