Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reid: Leman wasn't brought in as a spy


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

He's telling some stranger on the internets with the s/n "Porn Shop Clerk" to stay classy.

That's a win all day.

My sig alone oozes class.

Well, we all know that it's best to just ignore you. Being from Philly though, he probably thinks you're a Deacon in your local church.

Just smile and nod, its the best way to deal with them. And mind the batteries... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if he did bring him in there for that so what? It's done all the time.
a couple days ago i read an article about coughlin being angry with the redskins about picking up a QB they just released. made me think of the situation we are in with leman.
The Redskins' signing of former Giants quarterback Andre' Woodson to their practice squad on Sunday has New York coach Tom Coughlin and players thinking the move is as sinister as a twist in a Tom Clancy novel. Or some plot hatched by the Skins' northern Virginia neighbor, the CIA.

Woodson spent all of last season on the Giants' practice squad and was among New York's final cuts this weekend. He knows all the plays and, even worse, all the audible calls.

Coughlin was blunt in saying it was obvious why Woodson was signed.

"I have been a part of it," Coughlin said Monday when asked whether he has ever signed a player released by a team he was about to play. "I have seen it done. A guy doesn't get in the door two seconds, and he is in a classroom being grilled."

The cloak and dagger decision will force the Giants to change some audible calls for Eli Manning, Coughlin said.

Redskins coach Jim Zorn insisted Woodson wasn't signed just for this week.

""Oh, yeah. Yeah," Zorn said. "And that's something that I would be frustrated with, too, and I do understand that, that it makes it look like we're jumping on that, but that wasn't the major issue with the find."

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jch2jK2byPITd3qZncahBUmox6dgD9AIMII80

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the good news here is that a defensive player wouldn't know much about our offensive playbook and that's where a spy could really hurt us.... so I don't think it's that big of a deal.
new defensive scheme with no tape to go on this could be incredibly valuable.

the eagles really don't have much to go on as far as knowing the defense goes other than leman. we have years of tape under johnson's schemes that aren't likely to be changed much even with him gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...