Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brees DID NOT suffer a serious shoulder injury


Jmac

Recommended Posts

I don't know who said what, but this story is posted on NFL.com

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000536109/article/drew-brees-rotator-cuff-likely-to-miss-games

NFL Media Insider Ian Rapoport reported that the Saints believe quarterback Drew Brees has an injury to his rotator cuff, causing him weakness, pain and discomfort, that likely will cause him to miss games, according to sources with knowledge of the injury. Brees could potentially miss several games, underwent an MRI on Monday and is scheduled to undergo more tests to determine the injury on Tuesday and Wednesday, according to Rapoport.

Rapoport added that his tests will be sent to Dr. James Andrews for a second opinion. The belief is there isn't much structural damage, but they are waiting until Andrews to make a final call.

Being that it's there, I would assume that it's the most accurate information. 

Sure, I guess he could play, but I don't believe that he'll be effective if he does. And I don't think they are good enough to beat us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He threw 58 times though.  So he was only hurried 1 out of every 4 throws.  Tbh I don't really know, is that good?

I don't think it's too bad. However some of the attempts that weren't hurried were quick hits by Mallet. And this is where Brees was always good, especially against us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does any of that have to do with what he said? The Saints having Bountygate makes his statement any less douchey? 

Its like clockwork. Panthers fans makes douchbag statement. I say something about it. "Derp. Bountygate. Derp." 

I had nothing to do with the whole situation, so acting as if I can't call somebody for being an asshole is unauthentic. 

let me be real honest here. 

Reality is, if Brees plays, he will be hit/sacked/whatever. . . Which will most likely lead to aggregating the injury, best case scenario. More likely making worse. 

Which would be finishing the job.

The original post wasn't wishing injury on a player.  The injury has already been done. Brees playing that Panther defense will finish the job. 

That's  life. 

 

Suck it up, buttercup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brees is washed up so it doesn't worry me at all that's he's playing. His noodle arm is not going to hurt us with their limited weapons. There was a time when Brees and their offense scared the hell out of me. That time has passed thank goodness. The sun has set on their franchise. It's over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...