Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers oline versus J.J.Watt


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Concerned about our line and their ability to contain him. They tend to move him around and he can beast from any spot. They may need to keep someone in to shadow him and provide blocking assistance. This will further effect our offense having to.commit a player to keep Cam upright. So what strategy do they use to nullify this guy. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suh is just as dominant as him and we did fine against him last year, with a much worse line all around. Not worried in the least bit.

Suh lines up in the same place every down so it's much easier to scheme against than it is for Watt who has the freedom to go wherever he damn well pleases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been wondering this all week. Obviously, Watt is an elite defensive lineman. However, you can't watch his highlight reel and expect him to be that player on every down. JJ's a great subject for the hype machine and he's touted as such. What we do need is for our RBs, TEs and linemen not blocking JJ to do their jobs. If it's Cam versus JJ, I'll take my chances. If it's JJ +1 to the backfield with Cam dropping back, we're in trouble. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Step one is limit the number of times we have to throw long passes. We have to establish our rushing attack using everything we have at our disposal, including Cam. If we can't get rushing lanes open for Stewart the traditional way, then the read option needs to be used. A lot. It works. In fact it's a great idea to start the opening drive with the read option to get the offense going and avoid a slow start. Cam is incredible out is space, and even after contact he's so big he can still get a few more yards. Designed runs and the read option will get the offense energized, and drain Watt and their defense a bit.

Stay in 3rd and short situations where Watt's pass rush is mostly irrelevant, although he will leap in the air to bat down passes, hit him low when he pulls that crap. Cam knows how to protect himself running the ball, he'll be alright. He's crafty that way, and he knows how to avoid the big hits. There is no protection for Cam in the pocket when the gigantic maniac Watt get's to him. That's when injuries happen. Two huge men colliding, and one them is very vulnerable. Not good. An awkward twist and it's over. No need to let it come to that. Chip Watt when we have to throw deep. Also keep in mind that Kalil is a poor pass blocker, and it really shows against the 3-4. Cam needs to be ready to take off. 

It's also time for some razzle dazzle. We need some trick plays on offense. I don't think our opponents are expecting much in the way of creativity, so why not surprise them? And how about a smoke pass to Ginn? It's easier to catch shorter passes, and Ginn can flat out run right around a DB caught off guard. Show them some things they're not expecting. I just want to see some new plays that actually make sense.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watt's impact on a game is a lot like Julius Peppers was back in the day. He doesn't dominate every game, but when it's his day, you're going to have a bad time. You can't always take him out of a game and even on his bad days, he plays as well as just about any other d-lineman in the league having a good day.

That being said, Watt is just one guy, and there's a case to be made that beyond him, the Texans aren't that strong on defense. Alex Smith lit them up last week. Short passes and work with a good TE. Almost no one had Alex Smith on their fantasy team did they? Cam's got the skills for this, he just needs a good game plan and calls, and he's got to make some quick decisions. Slow developing plays will shut us down quickly.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...