Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Need Sig Help

usmcpanthers

By usmcpanthers,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Arroz con Panther Contributor

Arroz con Panther

Posted
Posted

Went to update the sig I had for years, and cant update due to the max 800 x 75 pixels . I resized my sig to fit but it looks horrible now. I currently dont have photoshop on any of my devices. http://postimg.org/image/szqus5mu7/

I don't have anything on my laptop, but you can download Gimp fo' free.  It's basically open source Photoshop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ivan The Awesome Mentor

Ivan The Awesome

Posted
Posted

Went to update the sig I had for years, and cant update due to the max 800 x 75 pixels . I resized my sig to fit but it looks horrible now. I currently dont have photoshop on any of my devices. http://postimg.org/image/szqus5mu7/

So you are saying you need this signature to be resized? or what is it that you're asking for? I could resize it for you when I get home, but it will look really crappy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
usmcpanthers Proficient

usmcpanthers

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ugh doesnt matter how I resize this sig, still hits the 800 x 75 pixel restriction. The sig at that size looks retarded. So lessons learned. If you have a old sig pic that was on here before they were removed....dont update or remove it. Because you wont be able to readd it. The only reason I did was to update the year, now im stuck with a tiny sig

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ivan The Awesome Mentor

Ivan The Awesome

Posted
Posted

ugh doesnt matter how I resize this sig, still hits the 800 x 75 pixel restriction. The sig at that size looks retarded. So lessons learned. If you have a old sig pic that was on here before they were removed....dont update or remove it. Because you wont be able to readd it. The only reason I did was to update the year, now im stuck with a tiny sig

Are there size limitations as in KBs? You could be in the size area with pixels but if your sig is too big of a file it won't go through. 

 

Mine is under 75 I believe. It's a gif though. I'm not sure if All pro takes restrictions off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Game thread

      By frankw · Posted

      Man whether it's the Panthers or the Hornets it's crazy how many foolish talking heads there are in the local media. I just unsubscribed from locked on Hornets. Doug Branson with his cheesy mustache is an absolute clown especially when his partner isn't on. Talking about trading LaMelo because he can't win basketball games by himself with no semblance whatsoever of a legitimate Center. These YouTube personalities will say anything for a damn click.
    • trucpfan
      Dream big: Imagine this future and tell me how you feel

      By trucpfan · Posted

      I’m hoping for that exact same scenario, two seconds would be big for us. I’d hope for 3 impact players. A WR/DL/DE that can contribute like this current class would be key to our rebuild.
    • outlaw4
      Forget about Bryce, Dave Canales is who we should be talking about.

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      When I look at what I can find, a carryover problem from last season is our receivers are still unable to get enough separation on a consistent basis. Canales is certainly better at scheming them open, like how he sneaked out Thielen for a big play. But then he's also having Thielen running routes he frankly shouldn't be doing anymore. I feel part of the RZ issues is not really having anyone - after trading Diontae - who can make those quick cuts on a short field to give whoever is under center a wider window to throw. We also only have one guy with blazing speed in Thompkins and from what I could see, he's really used more to draw away coverage. I bring this all up because what Canales needs for sustained success - other than QB - is the other receiver pieces we'll be getting in the offseason.  Otherwise, I have to say that Canales isn't as afraid to be aggressive offensively. As others mentioned, still doesn't run the ball enough at times. Finally, I still feel his playcalls still doesn't line up with his mantra of getting rid of the ball within x amount of seconds. Maybe I count too slow. Oh, and I'm glad Canales first game after a bye looked good. I feared he'd be like Ron Rivera where we would fall flat on our faces.
×
×
  • Create New...