Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nice Try.....SF....


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

Those Jerseys were very nice. I didn't like them at first, but as the game wore on, I loved the sheen that the red had, also thought it was cool and symbolic that the Nike check was in Gold and really popped. If I were a Niners fan, my jersey would be shipping in 3-5 business days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The black jerseys looked horrible. The 49ers colors have always been red/gold/white. The black is just a thin outline in their logo and now they have a whole jersey based on an ascent color.

I know black is popular and they just wanted to sell more jerseys, but in my opinion, they should have done a gold jersey. It would have looked better with the red, and been one of their actual colors, win/win.

5177304842_a101855242_o.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they looked funny to me and since when is black a prominent part of their color scheme? i mean when you think of 49er colors, is black seriously one of them? gold...red....white. those are the colors. not black.

49ers, like their QB, are trying too hard to come across as something special and accomplishing really nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks wack as fug on them...the all gold one looks much better...black isn't even part of their color scheme da fuq

Just corny to me to tack on a color that's not even your's and make it your main color for an alt. I guess the Dolphins gonna come out with all blacks...or maybe the Colts lul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Barry McCaulkinor

Honestly it doesn't look right b/c there's not enough of a contrast between red/black. It works for us b/c the blue is very bright and contrasts very well against black. Red not so much. It would have worked better if the red numbers were outlined in gold or white. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...