Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

songs you thought were totally rad as a kid but as you got older realized were corny af


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

Most nu-metal from late 90's and early 2000's basically.    Some are still guilty pleasures but you still know they are dumb.   

And fyi Limp Bizkit still had some rad tunes (not vocals/lyrics) because of Wes.  Three Dolla Bill Ya'll had some sick stuff on it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/11/2015 at 2:44 PM, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korn_discography

i still think those first few offspring albums (self titled through smash) were pretty good skate punk

Smash is still one of the best "all around" albums from start to finish I think.  I love that album.  I didn't like much from them after that but man Smash is great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've just seen enough highly touted prospects who pretty much everyone was high on end up busting to assume anything.
    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
    • And you would've probably said the same thing about a lot of highly drafted WRs who busted.
×
×
  • Create New...