Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Emergence of a man named Ealy


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Some times you have to poke the bear to get it angry and looks like R.R did exactly that. I have a feeling that Ealy will have a break out year. It is rare that a DE comes into his own in hIs 2nd year, but considering his back story it seems possible.  Taking  care of his disabled sister has made him grow up fast and motivated him to succeed. Heres to him showing out in 2015.

And by the way, the head case he replaced just had a child with his new girlfriend.  I will leave that alone.

 

Double thread.....sorry 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pulling for the guy, but the most accurate thing you said was that the second year is early for a 4-3 DE to break out.  He has done very little to prove anything yet, so I will watch and cross my fingers and hope your comments and optimism are justified. I know RR sang his praises, but RR tends to use the media to send messages to his players--more motivation than fact, at times.   He has shown positive signs, but the common fan often puts too much stock in a sack and tends to blame the DTs and LBs when we are gashed in the run game.  A DE must rush the passer with a "run-first" mentality in most situations; you cannot neglect your lanes, even when pressuring the passer.

Ealy was erratic in run support this pre-season.  I hope he gets that fixed.  Hardy was good vs. the run and had high sack totals of late--of course, he benefited from strong DT play.

If Ealy plays lights out, this defense will be top 3 in the NFL.  If not, he is something the opponent will exploit in the run game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ealy was erratic on run-support? I'm guessing you missed the final two preseason games. Again, Kony is way ahead of projections for a second year DE.

You have to take the whole body of work into account.  It would be nice to know how Ealy graded out in the preseason by PFF. I would like to think that he is making definitive progress,  but I am not going to look at things through homer glasses. Not saying that he isn't doing fine,  but the hype should be taken with a grain if salt (much like that last sack he got when he came in unguarded). His run support was a little shaky in August,  but hopefully he has the kinks out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pulling for the guy, but the most accurate thing you said was that the second year is early for a 4-3 DE to break out.  He has done very little to prove anything yet, so I will watch and cross my fingers and hope your comments and optimism are justified. I know RR sang his praises, but RR tends to use the media to send messages to his players--more motivation than fact, at times.   He has shown positive signs, but the common fan often puts too much stock in a sack and tends to blame the DTs and LBs when we are gashed in the run game.  A DE must rush the passer with a "run-first" mentality in most situations; you cannot neglect your lanes, even when pressuring the passer.

Ealy was erratic in run support this pre-season.  I hope he gets that fixed.  Hardy was good vs. the run and had high sack totals of late--of course, he benefited from strong DT play.

If Ealy plays lights out, this defense will be top 3 in the NFL.  If not, he is something the opponent will exploit in the run game. 

This pretty much sums it up.

DE and WR are our two weakest points.  Having someone like Ealy step up would be a nice surprise as would Charles Johnson having a good year.  CJ gets lost a month at a time on occasion.  If the DE's come through, I agree we will have a great D and take pressure off the offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ealy was erratic on run-support? I'm guessing you missed the final two preseason games. Again, Kony is way ahead of projections for a second year DE.

There were 4 preseason games--are we going to pick the ones we want to prove that he was not erratic?. Regardless, 2 preseason games does not establish any player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of our DEs sucked at the beginning of August. Let's not kid ourselves. Ron didn't chew asses out for kicks and giggles. Kony was the only one that stood out as the whole package. He closed the gap immediately and got constant pressure against The Pats and Steelers. There are no homer glasses here. We've got a second year DE who has steadily improved. Most of you guys are still stuck envisioning Oher and Turner abusing Ealy at training camp.

I don;t think we are in disagreement, but I think some of us are more skeptical of how he will do when the real bullets fly than you are.  Yes, he has improved, but there will be more on his shoulders this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...