Assemble your WR group

[AceBoogie]

Given that Devin Funchess is a rookie and has a ton of potential, he's locked in. Assemble your WR group given their stats from last season. 

 

WR A-38 catches 405 yards 4 touchdowns

WR B-48 catches 580 yards 1 touchdown

WR C-21 catches 296 yards 2 touchdowns

WR D-14 catches 190 yards 0 touchdowns

WR E- 9 catches 102 yards 0 touchdowns

[Jon Snow]

Going off last season's stats doesn't indicate what they will do this season.   Trying to determine what will happen with the current group is futile as the roster is not set at this point.   We all hope that whoever they line up will produce so I don't get the point in worrying about who is projected to be the main targets as long as someone steps up and gets it done.  

[top dawg]

You can't base such decisions off of raw stats without some type of context.  Too many Huddlers do this type of thing already. 

[Icege]

Needs more context

Otherwise it's like asking which kick in the dick feels the worst. Whether or not you have on steel toes is some information that I'd need to know.

[ItsNotGonnaBeAlright]

I didn't realise Cotchery had more receiving yards than Nicks did last year. 

The context, by the by:

A- Hakeem Nicks, B- Jericho Cotchery, C- Corey Brown, D- Ted Ginn, E- Kevin Norwood

[AKPantherFan]

I will take iron man, vision, Thor as my starters please. And black widow just because. 

 

 

[top dawg]

I didn't realise Cotchery had more receiving yards than Nicks did last year. 

The context, by the by:

A- Hakeem Nicks, B- Jericho Cotchery, C- Corey Brown, D- Ted Ginn, E- Kevin Norwood

I knew everyone but Ted Ginn. Anyway... 

That's why context is so important.  Cotchery was the second option in a suspect receiving corps. Nicks was arguably the fourth or fifth option in a loaded receiving corps (that got a little richer this season). 

Age,  hands, skill set and fit should be considered as well. What's  the upside? What's the downside?  

[AceBoogie]

I knew everyone but Ted Ginn. Anyway... 

That's why context is so important.  Cotchery was the second option in a suspect receiving corps. Nicks was arguably the fourth or fifth option in a loaded receiving corps (that got a little richer this season). 

That's exactly the point and why I chose not to name them with context included. So many people here like to point out why they don't receiver A without realizing that he outperformed every WR we have despite being in a more talented lineup. So even when you take context away and just get down to raw numbers he still outperformed anything we have. 

[top dawg]

That's exactly the point and why I chose not to name them with context included. So many people here like to point out why they don't receiver A without realizing that he outperformed every WR we have despite being in a more talented lineup. So even when you take context away and just get down to raw numbers he still outperformed anything we have. 

Hey,  I'm with you. That's  why I posted what I did about people scoffing at receivers in the other WR thread. 

[ItsNotGonnaBeAlright]

I'd really be fine if any one of the names being thrown around we're to come in. If it's Nicks, cool. If not, won't break my heart.

[top dawg]

In other words, Hakeem Nicks is coming home.

I'll be surprised given that little weird thing between him and Gettleman last time.  That being said,  it wouldn't shock me either. 

Gorgon City has a nice early 90s vibe by the way.