Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawks are talking to teams about trading Kam Chancellor


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

You guys really don't know how Seattle plays, do y'all? Kam is more LB than DB. 

Don't waste your breath or finger activity typing.  I got it, get it, explained it, debated it...nobody understands the position Shaq fills.  Most everyone wants to say he is TD's clone/replacement.

I don't argue with the uninformed, neither should you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this whole conversation is moot. Seattle's CBs are Sherman, Cary Williams, Tharold Simon, Marcus Burley, and Tye Smith. That's… not good. Without Chancellor, that secondary goes from great to eh. I think they have to pay him if they seriously want to contend. Either that or Chancellor sits a couple games and comes back on his own. 

They are now in the world of actually paying real NFL QB money for the QB position.  Browner, Byron Maxwell, etc..all left. Richard Sherman and Thomas have top 3 contracts at their position.  Now Russell Wilson does as well.  They can't field everyone and field a competitive team top to bottom if they give out top 3 money to all their best players.

2 years ago Richard Sherman, Thomas and Russell Wilson were a combined 4.4 million cap hit(dats crazy btw).  This year they are 40.4million!!!!   Michael Bennet wants a raise, Kam Chancellor wants a raise,  it's impossible to keep everyone and still keep a competitive top to bottom roster.

If staggered positioning and cap management you can sign everyone.  However as we have seen with our Marty Hurney contacts, those contracts end up becomming an anchor in the end.  Better to trade him now and get top dollar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adding a top notch DE would improve our d more than adding a top notch safety would imo. 

I just wish we would focus on having an all around D instead of one that basically lives or dies on the play of a DL.....doesn't matter how great you are at DL  bc it won't show up every game all game and then injuries happen.   Then you got big problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...