Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't forget the 2013 J.Boykin


Jmac

Recommended Posts

.When the Packers where desimated with injuries all season long with Cobb,Jones and Finely missing games, this guy came in and met the challenge. When Rodgers went down he still produced. 2014 he took a backseat to a WR corp that is one of the best in the league. He has shown that the pressure isn't to much for him when called upon. Playing well on a Superbowl caliber team is something to be considered. We are one more injury away from this WR  corps being total crap. This guy needs to get his chance and stick.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boykin is our 2nd best WR we can only hope the coaching staff is actually hiding that fact and plan on starting him week 1 opposite Funchess.....

What's also hard to forget is...Smitty...with him here we'd be in fantastic shape...4-94-1 63 yard TD last game...it's still sickening.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to red herrings that have been thrown in to muddy the waters because of agenda driven, ulterior motives,  the 2013 Jarrett Boykin is Jarrett Boykin. 

His 2012 and 2014 season basically cancel one another out.  They really are too small of a sample to judge.  Not to mention that he was hurt at the time in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to red herrings that have been thrown in to muddy the waters because of agenda driven, ulterior motives,  the 2013 Jarrett Boykin is Jarrett Boykin. 

His 2012 and 2014 season basically cancel one another out.  They really are too small of a sample to judge.  Not to mention that he was hurt at the time in 2014.

Nobody here has "agenda driven, ulterior motives."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contrary to red herrings that have been thrown in to muddy the waters because of agenda driven, ulterior motives,  the 2013 Jarrett Boykin is Jarrett Boykin. 

His 2012 and 2014 season basically cancel one another out.  They really are too small of a sample to judge.  Not to mention that he was hurt at the time in 2014.

I always enjoy reading you post about others having an agenda. Worth a quality chuckle at least.

Nobody knows which Boykin is the real Boykin at this point. He may get the opportunity to show us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just really don't understand the financial/lockeroom part of the whole Smitty thing still, do you?

I understand everything my post was about how much his loss has hurt our offense(we have no explosive players at the skill positions)...nowhere did I say anything about why or how he was released. Smitty was/is an all time fan favorite/best player his loss still sucks...dood did get into another fight in the preseason...he may be getting "worse" in that regard as he ages...he seems to give even less fugs than he used to.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always enjoy reading you post about others having an agenda. Worth a quality chuckle at least.

Nobody knows which Boykin is the real Boykin at this point. He may get the opportunity to show us.

Boykin had barely any playing time in either of those years.  Hardly any! So if someone bases anything on those two years in and of themselves, then they just aren't that smart.  If you take his numbers in their totality, which is the smarter and generally accepted means of evaluation (not to mention taking things like injury into account),  then you get a clearer picture.  It's that simple. 

I can accept anyone telling me that Boykin is a JAG,  or that Boykin is a WR4 at best,  but don't tell me that he sucks based on 2014 or 2012 because it makes little sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boykin had barely any playing time in either of those years.  Hardly any! So if someone bases anything on those two years in and of themselves, then they just aren't that smart.  If you take his numbers in their totality, which is the smarter and generally accepted means of evaluation (not to mention taking things like injury into account),  then you get a clearer picture.  It's that simple. 

I can accept anyone telling me that Boykin is a JAG,  or that Boykin is a WR4 at best,  but don't tell me that he sucks based on 2014 or 2012 because it makes little sense. 

You know I have to bust your chops a little.

I don't think he sucks. Considering our options right now at the position, I'm willing to give just about anyone a shot at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Which is more believable? Joe Person actually has reliable inside sources or Juan really doesn't know how to embed tweets? 
    • I'm on team trade back. 1. Walter Nolan is our missing link with a healthy DB. 2. I like Ayomanor as a more complete receiver than Isiah Bond.  EA's down field blocking is nasty, and he is field fast as opposed to 40 yard dash fast. 3. Donovan is a solid pass rush specialist. 4. Landon Jackson would provide both versatility as an Edge setter and rotational DE for our odd front. 5. Thomas is a great CB option to develop behind both Mjax and Horn 6. Schwesinger being available here would give Morgan a mile stroke of happiness. 7.  Jaylin Noell is a great speed/slot guy that could learn a ton from AT. 8. Ollie Gordon would be the perfect power compliment to Chuba. 9. Reed would be a solid developmental safety that played well after Winston's injury. 10. Conyers is an athletic freak.  Put him behind Sanders and Tremble. 11. GCL = developmental tackle.
    • Not working on Moton's deal means the door is open to anything. That's a positive. Hell just keeping him and not pushing cap into dead years is a win given the recent contracts they were giving out. It's a little difficult for me to swallow a teade and replace by draft for Moton. On one side it's being proactive with keeping the oline good and getting a rookie on a rookie deal vs an aging vet on a bloated last year witg last years sognings, that cap can be reallocated to other places. On the other hand it's focusing on the one strength while doing nada to improve the vast weaknesses they have elsewhere. Whatever they would potentially trade him for would have to be worth the risk of trying to replace him before he really needed to be replaced IMO. Sounds Maden easy theoretically but could easily backfire hard. Edit: The posible knee situation is a real wrench in the spokes.
×
×
  • Create New...