Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Out with the "old". In with the new?


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Should the FO  take a hard look at what may be an age old philosophy of giving vets a pass over newcomers as it pertains to starting, or even a roster position, when the newcomers seem to bring more to the table? I ask this not only from the perspective of skills, but from an I'm-hungry-and-want-to-make-this-team standpoint. After last night's preseason game, I do think that this is a valid question. 

Now I realize that one must keep things in perspective. Some guys were playing against first-stringers, while others not so much. But I don't believe that I am overthinking it when I say that sometimes the eyes just don't lie. Some players have "it", and some don't. The "it" doesn't necessarily have to be from an island perspective either, but how that player fits the puzzle of what we need to do this season. Though limited by situation and/or lack of opportunities, some players just seize and embrace the moment.  Extrapolation, projection, and even imagination are a must for any successful GM (and even the best armchair GMs, as opposed to those just talking out of the side of their necks).  And with a couple of players, you don't even have to use as much imagination as with some of the Panthers veterans because they already have proven that they can handle being on the big stage in a productive manner with past teams. 

Now I am not going to mention any specific names in reference to veterans that people penciled in as starters and/or locks to make the team weeks ago (lest someone rhetorically asks, "You really hate [so-and-so], don't you?", but I will say that when you take the emotion out of it and be as objective as you can about what's going to make the Panthers click in 2015, you can't deny that some have made a case---in a strong way---that they are the best options going forward. Like I have told some before, "It's not about the name, but the game."

Some of the younger hopefuls, at least in my opinion, seem to give the team an energy and edge that wasn't consistently there last season from some of the veterans---some of the nicer guys---that many apparently thought would just be handed their roles because they showed up, but did not show out.  Some of the "camp bodies", whether they be FA or UDFA, weren't given the memo. They were bought here to compete for roster spots, and they are doing it relatively successfully.  

For the second time this month, let me reference Dave Gettleman's words (taken from the Charlotte Observer) when he sent 89 packing:

“As I’ve stated many times, all decisions I make will be in the long-term best interest of the Carolina Panthers,’’ Gettleman said last year after releasing Smith. “Decisions, either popular or unpopular, have to be made for the greater good and it is imperative to take an unemotional global view."

It will be interesting to see how those words jibe with his coming personnel decisions. But for me, at least up until now, new blood is the way to go.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, the vets that should be in trouble are Mike Tolbert - replaced by Weghler. Tolbert used to generate his own running lanes in 2013 by carrying defenders 2 or 3 extra yards, not so much last year. Also he has dropped key passes like last year against Seattle on 3rd down.   Brochel- replaced by Ward. Ward consistently makes impact blocks. We need him to help establish the run s9 that the offense can avoid its slow starts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corey did drop those passes, however, Cam has got to develop some softer passes.  Everything doesn't need to be mock 2 to get to the receiver.   I suspect many passes that are dropped are because the wr just cant handle the velocity cam puts on his passes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corey did drop those passes, however, Cam has got to develop some softer passes.  Everything doesn't need to be mock 2 to get to the receiver.   I suspect many passes that are dropped are because the wr just cant handle the velocity cam puts on his passes.

he needs to softly lay them passes up there to give the defense a fair chance at catching them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corey did drop those passes, however, Cam has got to develop some softer passes.  Everything doesn't need to be mock 2 to get to the receiver.   I suspect many passes that are dropped are because the wr just cant handle the velocity cam puts on his passes.

So we get WRs that can actually catch those passes.

Brown dropped those because he has Gator Arms, not because they were too fast. KB Catches those lazers. Olsen Catches them too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corey did drop those passes, however, Cam has got to develop some softer passes.  Everything doesn't need to be mock 2 to get to the receiver.   I suspect many passes that are dropped are because the wr just cant handle the velocity cam puts on his passes.

QBs have different styles.  If you played with Brett Favre your job was to catch the dang ball....not ask him to take heat off it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam is the QB. He sees the bigger picture. Only he can see his window, so he is the best one to judge how hard/soft to throw the ball. It's up to the receiver to adjust and make the "catchable" reception.  Brown has had the opportunity to develop chemistry with Cam. He just has to catch the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not expecting Cam to change the way he throws at this point. I'm just hoping we can bring in some WRs after the cuts who are better suited to work with Cam. Corey is physically weak and his hands are unreliable, but he's quick and fast, so that's good. I think there have to be better WRs out there about to be cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/12642811-can-i-change-the-name-on-my-cruise-reservation-guest-service-24hr-short
    • I'm not a fan for a couple reasons. You have to nail your 1st 2 picks, especially when you're lacking as much talent across the board as we were and you traded away the number 1 overall pick. Barring injury, they need to be immediate 4 year starters, and on this team, that's a pretty low bar to hurdle. I also really hated the FA strategy building up to the draft, particularly the guards, and the draft strategy itself. A strategy that focused on building around a QB that was so terrible he had no business being on the field. It was clear to pretty much everyone, BY wasn't ready to be an NFL starter. We dumped everything to build around him in the hopes he would become what we drafted him to be. And while the end of the year started showing some promise, we still don't know going into year 3 if he's going to live up to the hype. Dumping all your resources to build around a single player (and hope for the best) isn't as important as building a complete team.  If there's any certainty in drafting, it's HQ interior linemen are found in rounds 2-3, and even 4 pretty regularly. Dumping a ton of FA cash into those 2 spots didn't make sense when we have so many holes. Draft guards, pay tackles. It's one of the staple principles of oline building.  XL was always a project. He didn't have years of consistent high end performance in college. His hands are bricks, he body catches a lot, and he looks more like a 4th round receiver than a 1st. Maybe he improves, maybe not. He looked extremely raw as a rookie and we can only hope he might develop by the time his rookie contract expires. I'm always a fan of drafting guys that actually have hands coming out of college. Who cares if you can get open, or fight for the ball, when you can't actually come down with it consistently.  Then we get to Brooks. Taking a RB with a torn ACL who may or may not see the field in 24/25 over Zach Frasier, who already looks the vet at a position we've been severely deficient at since pre-injury Ryan Kalil. Relying on Corbett, coming off injury, to move from guard to center is never ideal, and the injury bug bit yet again, and we were scrambling trying to find someone to lead our 200m offensive line. And the worst part, we traded up to do it giving up 2 5ths to take Brooks when we're lacking talent everywhere.  Wallace, meh. Sanders looked good before that neck injury. But now we're into day 3 where expectations aren't extremely high for making the roster, unless it's the Panthers, but you can find some position players and rotational players to start plugging the Swiss cheese roster.  I give him credit for getting Coker as an UDFA and the trade for Jackson, but if that's the highlight of your draft, there's some serious problems with your drafting.  If we had saved the FA money spent on the guards, drafted JPJ and Frazier, and still been in pretty close to the same spot, better off cash wise (or spent on other FAs) going into FA this year. Coker ended up playing better than XL in less time. Brooks is Eric Shelton 2.0 right now. And we used 5 picks in the 1st 2 rounds, if you count those included in the trades. That's too much given up for a team that won 2 games the year prior. JMO, but I think the whole offseason strategy last year was flawed from start to finish.  
    • Everything hinges on his ability to build through the draft so it's unknown until we see the upcoming draft class in action. That's all that will ultimately matter. We cannot afford anymore duds or projects especially in the early rounds.
×
×
  • Create New...