Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brandon Browner carted off with leg injury


UpstatePanther

Recommended Posts

Checked out a roster prediction. 

 

We all know Browner is a starting CB.

Lemon is a guard who probably won't make the team. 

Virgil is a DT who is on the bubble. 

Breaux is a backup CB who should make the team

Eller be and Humber are the starting Will linebackers.

Someone be sure to correct me if I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bad karma from a made up story by the NFL.

Logical.

How would the NFL benefit from making up aforementioned story?

The logic behind your response should be very entertaining...and before you jump off your chain, I have tried to be nice to you on more than one occasion.

We may have never landed on the moon, but Bountygate happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would the NFL benefit from making up aforementioned story?

The logic behind your response should be very entertaining...and before you jump off your chain, I have tried to be nice to you on more than one occasion.

We may have never landed on the moon, but Bountygate happened.

When do I ever jump off my chain? I'm love having conversations with open minded people. If you choose to take everything the NFL says at face value, I understand. I don't. Because they've been caught selling bullshit more than once. 

 

The moving-target prosecution works. Look at the New Orleans Saints. In June of 2012, Goodell's office leaked a document to Jason Cole of Yahoo! that purported to show a "ledger" of payments made to Saints team members for hits that injured opposing players.

The story was amazingly specific, citing a game against the Buffalo Bills in 2009 in which three players were paid $1,000 apiece for hits that led to players being "carted off" the field.

But it later came out that of the four Bills players injured in that game, three played defense, making it impossible for Saints defensive players to have been guilty. So Cole's league source "corrected" the leak, saying that the game in question was actually a November 2009 contest against the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.) Why is a Saints fan here in the preseason reading our threads?

2.) Which Saints coach told his players "he becomes human when we take out that outside fuging ACL"

3.) Why would the NFL randomly try to harm one of it's own teams with a pack of lies and false allegations?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anyone who cares

Their Kick returner looks really good. Speedy and good vision.

Their RB's look legit as well. Khiry Robinson stood out to me.

Their rookie QB looked good in the limited time I've seen him. He can run too.

Defense looks like dog poo and it won't help them nearly all those injuries are also on defense.

Josh Hill, their new starting TE, also looked pretty good. That was against Baltimore's second string though. It won't be as easy against Luke, TD and Shaq.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When do I ever jump off my chain? I'm love having conversations with open minded people. If you choose to take everything the NFL says at face value, I understand. I don't. Because they've been caught selling bullshit more than once. 

 

The moving-target prosecution works. Look at the New Orleans Saints. In June of 2012, Goodell's office leaked a document to Jason Cole of Yahoo! that purported to show a "ledger" of payments made to Saints team members for hits that injured opposing players.

The story was amazingly specific, citing a game against the Buffalo Bills in 2009 in which three players were paid $1,000 apiece for hits that led to players being "carted off" the field.

But it later came out that of the four Bills players injured in that game, three played defense, making it impossible for Saints defensive players to have been guilty. So Cole's league source "corrected" the leak, saying that the game in question was actually a November 2009 contest against the Panthers.

tinfoil hat time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I try to stay out of the Bountygate poo, because most rival fans want to believe it happened. Its only when you do research, because you don't have an interest in the Saints demise, that you see just how much the NFL lied about.

I don't expect you to buy into any of it. I'm fine with it. Just know I have my reasons for not buying any of the other side either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I try to stay out of the Bountygate poo, because most rival fans want to believe it happened. Its only when you do research, because you don't have an interest in the Saints demise, that you see just how much the NFL lied about.

I don't expect you to buy into any of it. I'm fine with it. Just know I have my reasons for not buying any of the other side either. 

WHY? 

Why, why, why, why why would they lie?  It makes no sense. 

Whhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy would they make that up?

 

 

 

 

 

Your move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...