Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2014-2015 NBA Schedule Release Discussion

Montsta

By Montsta,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

Montsta Community Regular

Montsta

Posted
Posted

Warriors have 25 nationally televised games, so now everyone can watch them and come here and tell me all about how they are only good in the regular season. We also have a league-high 20 back-to-back games, which sucks. 

This thread isn't burning the Hornets, it's simply an open discussion on the schedule for this upcoming season.

So please don't get angry I used the W-word here. And good luck in this upcoming season! 

Cheers!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cbarrier90 Newbie

cbarrier90

Posted
Posted

Warriors have 25 nationally televised games, so now everyone can watch them and come here and tell me all about how they are only good in the regular season. We also have a league-high 20 back-to-back games, which sucks. 

This thread isn't burning the Hornets, it's simply an open discussion on the schedule for this upcoming season.

So please don't get angry I used the W-word here. And good luck in this upcoming season! 

Cheers!!

Glad you're back but dang, this is the most insecure post coming off a championship ever! So much shade!

You won a championship. The West ended up beating itself up and every starting point guard the Warriors faced was injured during each series (Cleveland in particular was just LeBron and scrubs) but at the end of the day, history will only remember the Warriors won a championship and they were fun.

Also, welcome to the awful world of having a ton of back to back games! It does suck!

As for the Hornets, another start like last season where the team takes months to gel and I could easily see Cho and possibly others let go (I think Clifford, like him or not, has a longer leash than Cho does at this point.) Between this very real possibility, the Panthers full of optimism right now, and the sting (PUN) of being so let down last season, I'm taking a  wait-and-see approach with the team this year. That first month will tell us alot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Did we take over a thread about who you'd take #1 by having a debate on who you'd take #1? Basically you still don't want to answer my question, probably because your answer would be either T-Mac like myself, or Hunter, which taking a CB #1 overall is even crazier on the surface than what you're saying I'm stupid for in wanting a WR there. As I've said before, it's a season without a traditional clear top pick(s).  It would be great if we could trade back if we got #1, but if not, there's nothing wrong with taking a truly elite WR and build out our roster correctly for once instead of always trying to find the quick fix and it backfiring. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I just thought of an interesting comparison for what I'm arguing with taking T-Mac and how to build up to hopefully being a contender. The mid 2000's Arizona Cardinals In 2003 they took Anquan Boldin early in the 2nd, kinda a decent comp for Legette with style of play and being more of an elite #2 than a true outside #1 (they also took a WR in the 1st too who didn't pan out). In 2004 they took Larry Fitzgerald #3 overall, the true outside #1. Their QB's at the time, Jeff Blake and Josh McCown The QB they passed on to take Fizgerald, Philip Rivers. They were in the Super Bowl a few years later after they found their QB in Warner to slot into an already built out roster of elite weapons. Cam, you asked how it would look if we passed on a QB who pans out for a WR, well, do you think the Cardinals regret taking Fitz over Rivers?  I highly doubt it. Our roster is more than one offseason away from contending.  I'm not looking for the quick fix because there isn't one with the state of this franchise at the moment, I'm looking to contend for a decade. I don't think a QB in this draft class is good enough to take 1st overall with everything else we still need.  My next preference would be an elite pass rusher, but again, I don't see one of them in this draft either. My personal bias aside, I very honestly think T-Mac is the most can't miss offensive prospect in this draft (Hunter would be that on defense).  He is the WR we've been trying to get since we lost Smitty.   Brooks, T-Mac, Legette, Coker/FA, Sanders would have the potential to be one of the best offensive weapon sets in the NFL.  Sure, hopefully we could hit on a superstar QB in the next draft, but even if not, if those guys pan out, with them all are in their prime together, we wouldn't need a Mahomes or Allen to contend, we'd only need to find our Jared Goff. and spend all our FA money the next couple offseason on Defense.
    • R0CKnR0LLA
      Chase Daniels breaks down Bryce vs DEN

      By R0CKnR0LLA · Posted

      Competent QBs can read defenses presnap, see where their best matchups are and already know where they're going with the ball. Then have good footwork with fast fundamentally sound dropbacks. See the field well and decisive with their decisions on where to go with the ball. And an NFL caliber arm, get the ball out quickly and deliver it with velocity. Bryce can do none of these things.
×
×
  • Create New...