Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets Forum Revival...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Hello all. 

 

This section of the Huddle is first and foremost a Hornets forum. It has come to my attention that some folks seem to enjoy just popping in here to poo on the Hornets without adding much (if any) value to this joint. 

As such, those people will find themselves banned not only from the Hornets section but the rest of the Huddle as well. If you don't have something constructive to say about the Hornets (positive or negative) and find yourself in here just to troll.... you may want to stop. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello all. 

 

This section of the Huddle is first and foremost a Hornets forum. It has come to my attention that some folks seem to enjoy just popping in here to poo on the Hornets without adding much (if any) value to this joint. 

As such, those people will find themselves banned not only from the Hornets section but the rest of the Huddle as well. If you don't have something constructive to say about the Hornets (positive or negative) and find yourself in here just to troll.... you may want to stop. 

 

Impossible to converse with someone who calls themselves a "fan" yet they poo on the team 24/7. My posting in this section went down from 2-3 a day to once a week because of it. I'll definitely return to form if I don't have to listen to the debbie downers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind negative posts as long as they are well thought out and provide some worth to this forum. 

 

"this teams sucks" is not a good post. 

 

"This team needs big improvement in these areas" is a much better post. 

Sadly most will just destroy the pick that we had and not say what we should've done better.  But it's kind of common sense at this point, I suppose.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On vacation will get back Sunday. I'll do a breakdown of a player on our team. Their strength and weakness. Projected minutes. And other stuff. Just inbox me the player a player if you want a specific one if not it will just be a random order

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...