Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton outnumbered 1 to 3....


dpm0409

Recommended Posts

The Panthers are winning because of Cam, how are the Falcons doing with JJ?

And a top tier defense.  Lets face, the Falcons were awful last year on the defensive side of the ball, and JJ couldn't do much about that.  That being said, a qb is usually more integral to an offense than any other specific offensive player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's unquestionably the best player on the Falcons, he runs circles around anything associated with the Bucs, and he can laugh in the face of whatever is left of the Saints, and if you put him on the Panthers he'd be the second best thing we have on offense.....but I cannot make the case that Julio Jones is a bigger playmaker than Cam Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pat Y said Julio is the best player in the division. When did they legalize methamphetamine in Tampa Bay?

Pat Y is the Bucs ESPN guy.  Like all Bucs fans he probably suffers from Kuechly cock envy.

I've never seen a fanbase so damn jealous and salty as Buc fans are about Kuechly, because their myth of a LBer doesn't get as much appreciation as they feel he should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pat Y is the Bucs ESPN guy.  Like all Bucs fans he probably suffers from Kuechly cock envy.

I've never seen a fanbase so damn jealous and salty as Buc fans are about Kuechly, because their myth of a LBer doesn't get as much appreciation as they feel he should.

Let's not go that far... Pat Y worked for the observer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a more interesting way to phrase that question would be if you were starting a franchise today and had to pick an offensive player with the first overall pick from the NFC South, then who would you pick. I'd go with Cam but it'd be interesting to see who the "pundits" would choose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...