Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Most Dynamic Offense Ever Under John Fox?


joethoma

Recommended Posts

The overall body of work for the preseason has not exactly been stellar, but there are 5 things I am taking from the preseason that have me legitimately excited about the potential of our offense this year. As several of the players have said, they only just began to scratch the surface of what they could do last year, being that it was the first year with a stable quarterback situation. I believe the following are reasons we could add to an offense that was already incredible in the second half of last year.

#1) Running Backs

With John Fox, it all starts with the running backs. We are one of the only teams left in the league who run more than we pass, and have proven we can do it well in spite of the other team knowing we are going to do it. The tandem of DeAngelo Williams, Jonathon Stewart, and Mike Goodson is as intimidating as any trio in the league. DeAngelo has become a superstar in his own rite, and if Stewart can come even close to replicating his rookie success, the offense will do good things. Even if Stewart misses some time or a lot of time with his Achilles injury, I think we will be fine with Mike Goodson. Goodson has unbelievable explosion and I think he can run in between the tackles and bounce to the outside. He may prove to be the best of the bunch receiving from the backfield. I think Goodson may be the offensive steal of the draft (if he can just hold on to the football).

#2) Third Receiver

The Panthers have struggled to have a great second receiver in the past few years, let alone a good third receiver. Working out in the off-season with Steve Smith has obviously yielded good results for Kenneth Moore. I think he is undoubtedly our third receiver right now. As other people have noted, it's hard not to draw a lot of comparisons to Moore to Ricky Proehl. Good things happened to the Panthers the last time we had three legitimate receivers (which really hasn't happened since '03). DeWayne Jarrett continues to, in my opinion, not disappoint but certainly not give the Panthers any confirmation he can be a starting wide receiver. I think his blocking and knowledge of the play book have improved, but with him not playing special teams, he’s probably going to be inactive on game days unless there is an injury.

#3) Tight End

Even though none of them have set themselves apart to the level of being great, the collection of Gary Barnidge, Jeff King, and Dante Rosario is probably the best collective group of tight ends the Panthers have had. All of them contribute to special teams, can block, and have/are showing the ability to get open. Their versatility will be very important to the Panther offense moving the chain. I could see all three being active on game day. As previously noted, Barnidge does seem to have the most potential as a receiver, but King and Rosario have both stepped up when they have had to.

#4) Offensive Line Depth

One of the biggest questions going into the season (other than defensive tackle which we all know is a work in progress) was the offensive line depth after losing the top three backups from last year. Obviously, without them playing in the regular season, we can not make a definitive conclusion right now. But I think this group has shown great improvement doing the preseason. To me, Mackenzie Bernadeau has shown the most improvement, along with interior lineman Geoff Schwartz and Duke Robinson (whom Fox singled out for praise). We don’t really have a good backup at tackle, but the versatility of Gross, Otah, and Wharton will hopefully be sufficient if injuries force any changes.

#5) Quarterback Depth

Jake Delhomme is still the unquestioned starter and gives us the best chance to win this year. However, I think Josh McCown and Matt Moore are above average back-ups and a definite upgrade over backup situations we have had in year’s past. Jake going down with an injury would not be a good thing, but the fact we have 2 experienced back-ups with experience in this offense is a better situation than what we experienced in past years.

Any one else have any opinions about the offense? I think when we look at it objectively, we can be optimistic about the potential of this offense.

I do believe Fox and Davidson were not going to tip their hand during the preseason, and did a good job of instead just using the games to evaluate potential contributors to the team under game conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the offense should be great, and lets face it... its gotta be if we gonna win the division

give the defense time... they may actually be good, if they can just learn to tackle, I never thought we would be such a soft tackling team

HOWEVER.. i think having T. Davis and Beason back will improve things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am really not a Jake hater at all.... but what prevents this offense from being better than our other offenses under Fox is the deterioration of Jake. When we had Smith and Moose in his prime lining up opposite one another, there was not a more dangerous passing attack in the division. Jake could get it there with precision too.... which is the biggest part of what he lacks now. His accuracy has really suffered at the hands of time.

In terms of impact on the scoreboard, an elite passing game will usually take you a bit further than an elite ground attack. We at one time had a nearly elite passing attack with an average running game. We now have a superstar wideout trapped in an average passing game with an elite running game. I say the scales tip in favor of the strong passing game.

As for the defense, it will improve. Peppers playing at full strength with Beason and Davis back will help our run defense exponentially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...