Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question


The Huddler

Recommended Posts

Whats the difference between a maltliqour and a good ol beer like an IPA, or other very good, but high alc% beers? For instance, im drinking colt 45 because i dont have money and i wana be very tipsy. Obviously you there is a difference between malt liqours and very good, but high abv% beers..

 

my question is, are those good, expensive beers still called malt liqours technichly they are above 6.0 abv%??

 

go panthers bitch

 

basicly are fancy beers, whatever brands called malt liqours?? 

 

Or only shitty beers which makes shitty posts past 6% called that.

 

newb here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually has to do with crap ingredients added to it to make cheap alcohol.  Things like malt and sugar ferment and raise the %, and don't cost much money.

Will have a "sweeter" mouth on it, as it has more sugar, which means more alcohol.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wont be able to answer your question because i have a very low Beer IQ.

I will say though.....In the past, when I was trying to get a buzz on a budget, I drank a few of those Four LoKo's.. They will hammer you, but....in the morning you will feel like you got hit with a real hammer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe it originated with state laws and their alcohol caps. Anything above the alcohol cap was considered malt liquor. Now it's more akin to "higher" alcohol American lagers. Take a standard American lager and add more adjuncts (sugar, corn, rice) to boost the abv. These ingredients don't make the beer sweeter, but rather drier. There will be a bit of sweetness from the additional alcohol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • he averaged 2 yards in YAC per reception last year.  He can't generate quick separation.  He was debating retirement last year.    Yet we championing him as some great option.  AT is a savvy vet we force feed the ball too......on a team starved for basic offense the last couple seasons.  We overrated AT.  Which is why some freak when people like JT on his podcast point out the painfully obvious about him.   
    • The Athletic has us ranked 28th on their post-draft power rankings, mainly due to us picking T-Mc instead of defense in round 1. They recognize we needed WR help, but... https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6317651/2025/04/29/nfl-power-rankings-post-draft-rookies-eagles-chiefs-bills/
    • I mean, he is a slot technician.  That's what he does.  So, in a good offense, you would be trotting him out there on 3rd downs and situationally.....to not take what they give him but to move chains.  It's a niche.  AT hasn't threatened defenses in years.  Last time we saw Renfrow on the field he averaged..... 6 yards YAC per catch.  Adam Thielen last year averaged....2 yards in YAC per catch last year.  I still contend in reality, AT isn't a slot WR.  Not in reality.  He is an aging rec TE.  And those aren't the same thing.  AT simply can't generate quick separation or provide YAC.    
×
×
  • Create New...