Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's Official Yardbarker is Worse the B/R


Recommended Posts

I was already doubting the most hated players in the NFL list when I saw this.

Apparently we have the worst QBs in NFL history.

While we haven't had the greatest I would say we have had far better than some teams.

http://network.yardbarker.com/nfl/article_external/have_the_carolina_panthers_produced_the_worst_quarterbacks_in_nfl_history/18978656?linksrc=story_sport_nfl_module_related_18987506

Kerry Collins was a basket case but not a bad QB.  More childish than bad.

Steve Beuerlein ran one of our most potent offenses.

Jake took us to the Super Bowl and had a pretty good run for 5 or 6 seasons

Cam is a two time Pro Bowler and has the potential to take us all the way.

Yeah, Jimmy Clausen, Chris Weinke, Rodney Peete and Jeff Lewis (god rest his soul) weren't much but damn Carolina the worst? 

IMO Yardbarker just lost ground to Bleacher Report.   Actually I have enjoyed some of the more recent Bleacher Report articles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol............  Cam hater applying his logic not just to Cam,  but to the entire Panthers' franchise. 

 

I refuse to believe that anyone can look at the qb of every franchise and not have the Jags as the worst in that category.    Leftwich, Garrard, Brunell, Gabbert, Bortles.   Especially since in the above mentioned article,  The SB berth for the Panthers,  is solely credited to Jake Delhomme          If that's the logic then Delhomme >>>>>>>Every qb the Jags ever had start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...