Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rj hunter


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

Rumor has it we really like him and might move around to get him.

Have said it before but Al for Gerald Wallace + 16 would be ideal. Alternatively, Celtics apparently like a guy like WCS so they could be an ideal candidate to move to 9. Lots of interesting options potentially especially given what transpired yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rumor has it we really like him and might move around to get him.

Have said it before but Al for Gerald Wallace + 16 would be ideal. Alternatively, Celtics apparently like a guy like WCS so they could be an ideal candidate to move to 9. Lots of interesting options potentially especially given what transpired yesterday.

I would love to trade back and pick up some extra picks or players to draft RJ Hunter. I really think he has potential to be the next Klay Thompson in a couple of years. Golden State showed us that you can now win a championship with jump shooting teams. It's time that we build and draft well so we can finally compete.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to trade back and pick up some extra picks or players to draft RJ Hunter. I really think he has potential to be the next Klay Thompson in a couple of years. Golden State showed us that you can now win a championship with jump shooting teams. It's time that we build and draft well so we can finally compete.

The caveat here is I would only try to trade back if Super Mario doesn't fall to us. Booker, Hunter, Oubre, etc are all big reaches at 9 and we need all the assets we can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like him.  He really stood out in the Tourney. 

Looking at his numbers, his shooting percentages went pretty far down last year.  His first two years hovered around 45% FG and last season was 39%

2012/13: 2PT: .513    3PT: .365

2013/14: 2PT: .523     3PT: .395

2014/15: 2PT: .488     3PT: .305

 

Although he did take a huge spike in attempted shots so that factors in with him carrying that team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The caveat here is I would only try to trade back if Super Mario doesn't fall to us. Booker, Hunter, Oubre, etc are all big reaches at 9 and we need all the assets we can get.

I saw Mario going as high as 5th to the Kings who are in need of another wing. If he doesn't go at 5th he definitely will be gone by the time Detroit picks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw Mario going as high as 5th to the Kings who are in need of another wing. If he doesn't go at 5th he definitely will be gone by the time Detroit picks.

Another wing? That's all they've drafted for the past three years! It's like us taking Kaminsky.

That said, they are the Kings, so they'll take Mario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay, so answer this one then, since you said you can't answer something you don't think will happen...... You have said numerous times in the past that even though you want them, you don't think Deion will allow us to take his son or Hunter. You then taking Ward #1 over T-Mac just because he's the QB?
    • Thanks for that sounds very interesting.   I have a scientific mind usually and don’t believe in wide spread conspiracy theories but with the NBA it’s so obvious.  The fuggin rigged draft is something only an idiot wouldn’t see.  But the NBA is 100% about big market money.  It’s not even a real league.  It’s 10 teams that have a shot.
    • This response is absolutely and utterly insane, I've literally this same thing out multiple times in previous posts about mock drafts, like a bunch of times. I've never once denied it's a possibility of them going #1, I've just said that I wouldn't take them there. And YET AGAIN, you're proving that you don't believe they are elite QB prospects, you literally just said "first prospects off the board REGARDLESS OF TALENT" It's literally what I've been saying this whole time, these QB's don't have the draft grades to deserve that pick.  They're only being mocked there because mocks are trying to predict the draft, not saying who deserves to be drafted where.   Dude, this is exactly why I question your reading comprehension skills.  You keep trying to say you got me with something, but in those exact posts you're just proving my points, the literal opposite of catching me in some lie or moment of ignorance.
×
×
  • Create New...