Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question for my beloved Panther fan friends


Hawk

Recommended Posts

the most dangerous place for a QB, regardless of how mobile he is, is the pocket. that will never change. he's a smart runner and more than able to take care of himself in that regard. it's the defenders dropping into the backfield that he can't see that is the threat and that's going to be the same with all QBs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the most dangerous place for a QB, regardless of how mobile he is, is the pocket. that will never change. he's a smart runner and more than able to take care of himself in that regard. it's the defenders dropping into the backfield that he can't see that is the threat and that's going to be the same with all QBs.

 

​RG3 will disagree!  Cam obviously plays a very agressive style and he's willing to take the big hit to make the big play, but how long can that last?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hawk serious question, how many Panthers games have you watched?

Cam avoids contact like the plague... he's no RGIII.

There have been many, many times when he could've picked up 3,4 5 more yards, but got down...

Rayzor is right... he's been much more vulnerable in the pocket than running.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with so much guaranteed money, are you concerned at all about Cam's playing style with regards to longevity etc?

 

 

​Let me ask you this

With how little your QB has to do with your overall team's success are you or are you not terrified that he will be grossly overpaid?

I'd be more scared with a QB who isn't nearly as good as ours has been or will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hawk serious question, how many Panthers games have you watched?

Cam avoids contact like the plague... he's no RGIII.

There have been many, many times when he could've picked up 3,4 5 more yards, but got down...

Rayzor is right... he's been much more vulnerable in the pocket than running.

​a few, but no, not many.  Just seems to be that he has taken some pretty big hits over his career is all.  Maybe I'm wrong then but seems he uses his strength and size alot and that has to take a toll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

​a few, but no, not many.  Just seems to be that he has taken some pretty big hits over his career is all.  Maybe I'm wrong then but seems he uses his strength and size alot and that has to take a toll.

​Not really, the main time he uses his size is goal line stuff, and I can't remember a time he took a big hit on the goal line.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...