Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton gives the nod to Stephen Hill, mentions Corey Brown.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

​Well he kinda mentions why he's more hyped for Hill. Hill's got the height and weight that Corey doesn't have. 

Hill has the height and weight that Steve Smith doesn't have too. Measurables aren't everything.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

​Well he kinda mentions why he's more hyped for Hill. Hill's got the height and weight that Corey doesn't have. 

​It's untrained analysis by him. Any fourth grader could use that reasoning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Classic David Newton, jumping on the hype machine. Voth and Igo both thought Philly was the best wideout today, and Newton just "mentions" him and says he had a "decent" showing. The thing I'm most excited about is Philly gaining 10 pounds AND speed, somehow. Performances now really don't mean anything at all, but to gain 10 pounds and be faster than last season is huge.

Also when does 5-11 make you short? Steve Smith was 5-8 for clarification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also when does 5-11 make you short? Steve Smith was 5-8 for clarification.

​Not sure why you quoted me but I agree. He's not even an inch shorter than Odell Beckham, and I think that guy's done pretty well for himself...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a Dave Gettleman team it is.

I actually like Newton, but there are times when it's painfully obvious that he's a NASCAR reporter covering football.

You do have a point but to say him and Smith are the same size is a bit misleading. Guess I take it personal being 5-11 myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would only obviously help this team tremendously if both Hill, and Brown came into their own this year for us.

If both of them had a good day, why not compliment both, and leave it at that?

Great point. Why roes it have to be either or. It could just as easily be both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...