Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting tidbit which gives me more confidence in our GM's drafting


bhughes

Recommended Posts

Here is a clip from the monday morning qb about Eric Flowers. Sounds like he was drafted way to high to some coaches. It makes me feel a little bit better that we didn't reach to fill a need in th first round like many of the "expert analysts" think we should have done. By the way, it seems to me analysts only think a team does good in the draft if they draft positions of need or draft high or have a lot of picks. Seems like every article I see about which teams doing the best in the draft were mostly teams drafting in the top 10. 

 

 

http://mmqb.si.com/2015/05/24/memorial-day-nfl-veterans-tom-brady-deflategate/4/

1. I think the Giants are fooling themselves if they think the pectoral muscle injury suffered by left tackle Will Beatty, which reportedly could keep him out until at least October, won’t have huge ramifications. Beatty had developed himself into a very capable left tackle, and now the Giants are left with either Justin Pugh (who underwhelmed so much at right tackle he had been penciled in at guard ) or Ereck Flowers, the ninth overall pick out of Miami earlier this month. I recently spent the weekend at the Coaches of Offensive Line (COOL) Clinic in Cincinnati, and the reviews on Flowers were not good. “Some of the worst technique I’ve ever seen in a player drafted that high,” said one veteran NFL line coach. “He played for one of the best coaches, Art Kehoe, and his technique was terrible,” said another coach. “That tells me he doesn’t take coaching well. That’s a big problem because all of the recent tackles have struggled making the transition. It now takes them until Year 3. You can thank the spread and the [collective bargaining agreement] for that.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spread offense is really easy to learn, but limits the level of preparedness in athletes coming into the pro game. i have been saying for years that the nfl is evolving towards more spread type mindsets, but that isn't making the players more technically sound.

also, college rules as they are limit the amount of time that coaches and players have together which is why the game has been shifting that way, but the CBA keeps coaches at the pro level from having as much dirt time with the players as they need to help them improve. development takes longer and there's more to learn coming into the league, but less time to learn what they need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman earned my trust last year with his explanation regarding why he didn't reach for guys like Morgan Moses.  He knows what he is doing. 

That being said, I still am wary about what we have. But why add more question marks to question marks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spread offense is really easy to learn, but limits the level of preparedness in athletes coming into the pro game. i have been saying for years that the nfl is evolving towards more spread type mindsets, but that isn't making the players more technically sound.

also, college rules as they are limit the amount of time that coaches and players have together which is why the game has been shifting that way, but the CBA keeps coaches at the pro level from having as much dirt time with the players as they need to help them improve. development takes longer and there's more to learn coming into the league, but less time to learn what they need.

​I've been saying for a long time that the new CBA rules are also what's caused the rise in serious injuries across the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettlemen is also finding players that fit this system.  For example, we get rid of Smitty and  bring in a pair of tall WRs.  Gettlemen knows that with a big qb who can run, a running game is the best pass protection, so now we have maulers up front (Williams, Oher, Norwell, Turner) instead of dancing bears (Gross, Chandler, Hangartner, etc)  So, our Tackles are not like an OT in front of Brady or Manning--that is because Cam's running ability freezes a member of the defense and causes them to look run first.

On defense, do you get the idea that Boston and Benwikere were good fits here?  What about Shaq Thompson?  People do not think we had a great offseason because they do not realize what is going on.  Much of this is speculative, but I think the picture is clearing up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

​I've been saying for a long time that the new CBA rules are also what's caused the rise in serious injuries across the league.

 Thank goodness for our training staff. We had less strange injuries than other teams last year & I hope that continues. The average youth of our players helps too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frigging hate that the CBA prevents nfl players from practicing football. 

 

That is why there are more injuries than ever. 

It's why olines take so figging long to gel now days, especially if there is an injury to any of your starters. 

 

Ugggggggggg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said this and what does it have to do with our gm?

​Exactly. People have criticized our first two rounders as reaches. Every team will not see every player in the same light. The hope is once they get their hands on them they can help them improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding general principles about draft efficiency and the value found in later rounds, I thought this article was interesting:

Tracking NFL Draft Efficiency:  How Contingent is Draft Position to Success?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/prishe/2015/05/22/tracking-nfl-draft-efficiency-how-contingent-is-success-to-draft-position/

Among the tidbits:

Over 5 years, -- Undrafted players (14%) were the 3rd most likely group to comprise 2014’s starters…only behind 1st round (30%) and 2nd round (18%) picks.

Over 3 years -- 21% of All-Pros from this period came from either the 3rd, 4th, or 5thround.

It would be interesting to have a breakdown of these numbers from pre-CBA 2011 when rookie contracts were quite expensive versus post CBA 2011 when the economic value playing field across draft position is a bit more evenly distributed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said this and what does it have to do with our gm?Flowers wasn't on the board when we picked so whoever wrote this poo got this from Gettleman? I'm confused...

​No one said this specifically regarding Flowers. Yes he was off the board. I mean that I believe the OT's in this draft were not that strong, yet draft analysts don't like that we didn't "address" our biggest need, the O-line, in the first 2 rounds. This bit of information about what actual NFL people thought about one of the top OT's in the draft makes me feel better we didn't reach for one.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All these ex-players coming out and showing how bad Bryce has been came after our announcement. The announcement Monday opened the door to let them say it without getting the brand that is the NFL to lash out. They don't want a #1 to fail, quite the opposite. Its drama, but not in a good way. For the NFL Bryce getting benched is not a good look, just like his play. Lets think on the timeline here in 2024 The video evidence was there last year. Internally, they got a good chance to review it throughout the season and really well after it ended. Upon review, out goes Fitt cause the NFL tape and the evaluation didn't match up.  Morgan must have done one hell of a not my guy sales pitch or at least explained learning from it very damn well and what the next QB may look like if Bryce didn't improve. 0% chance the coaches, Tepper, Morgan, exc went into 2024 without starting to plan the next steps if Bryce didn't correct his course and some big strides in 2024. It's bad business to just stick to a bad stock or employee without an out, even when you like the stock or employee. Performance trumps all. They had to start at least a framework of what to do if Bryce did not improve base on the gap between expectations and output in 2023. And they did things internally to help evaluate the offense as a whole before just a straight 1 and done season from Bryce. They improved the cast with proven commodities to see where gaps were. Externally others had time to look over the 2023 film in depth. Analysts, reporters worth a damn, other players, and want to be football nerds had some tough pills to swallow if they took a stance that Young was the right guy coming into the 2023 draft. A lot took steps back from the stance he was a super processor guy that can overcome physical shortcomings. They had another target to ease their miss from the 2022-2023 draft cycle: Tepper. Damn well they should for this mess and so much more before 2023. But Bryce's NFL flaws were shown, and the team made the exact effort the masses claimed was the real problem: supporting cast needed upgrades. And guess what, Morgan did that. A proven OG pair, another proven WR (so 2 legit WRs, even though Chark was a legit deep threat too), heavy O draft. Brought in Canales for a guy that has promise as an offensive mind to help out. Think this is part of a larger plan to get all the parts of the offense together while the QB is cheap to evaluate the QB and start over if required so the next years have good support for any QB. They did not use Fitts vision of the QB lifting meh into greatness.  Then you have game 1 against the Saints to start 2024. Arguably one of Bryce's worst games out of his 1st 17 games kicked off the year. The upper management's fears were on display and that offseason backup plan was squarely on the table to find a new QB. I'd speculate they had a meeting the following days to start talking about what triggers moving on. Coming off the heels of a really bad 2023, and an offseason where he needed to take a mental break for a sec and catch some Netflix. Yeah that's not a bad idea for a guy that's been through the grind and needs a wee bit of time to unwind. The issue is we are not talking about a vet here or someone that just had a bad year after a few years in. We are talking about a guy who didn't process the game at the right speed all last year taking a break...... The bad performances last year coupled with the offseason broke folks. Dante and Thielen are workaholics. They are not the Randy Moss type that it comes natural to. Thielen isn't some physical freak and Dante is a gym rat to get there. Others mentioned body language of other players from 2023 and 2024 practice. I think the locker room had enough DURING game 1. A guy that didn't have it last year, didn't go 100% in through the last game till game 1 of 2024 really would rub those type of players the wrong way and start escalating from soft whispers in 2023 to visible and vocal signs in 2024. Enter game 2, which was the worse of his 18-game career. There was not time to watch the Chargers film and change Canales' mind from the Sunday post-game comments. I think it was more likely a sit down of the front-line leaders (coaches) with the executive team (Morgan and Co) with the CEO (Tepper) and they all agreed to start the process of evaluating the team and start filling the QB role with someone other than Young. Due to the way the NFL works, Bryce isn't out like a typical employee, but it would take one hell of a turnaround for him to stick here long term. 2nd they had the rest of the locker room to contend with. Continuing to let Young out there was pretty much hurting both sides getting later pay checks due to the bad results which was perceived as bad players (something they heard to round out 2023). Alos you have a staff that cannot police bad play as the #1 overall why should the rest give 110%/ make the business decision to stay healthy while collecting checks. Now if they see signs of growth in practice in all forms from Bryce, he can come back and win back a locker room. Right now the tone suggest relief that its not Bryce as QB (ouch). Then you have the big bandwagon of Chase Daniels, Kurt Warner and the like agree with this move from the team on Monday. They saw it possible in review of 2023 and the reports from Bryce, players going on during the offseason and camp. They saw the gaps that were there from 2023 tape, so seeing it again and worse made it easy for that bunch to really lay into why we did this Monday. Crazy Steve A is always going to take a hot take that stirs the drama pot because it gets eyes and talk which equals $$$$$. Others follow that stick too. That group have a correct take on Tepper' failures and issues, but Bryce's failures are also true and they need to admit that too. As for Bryce getting blindsided by this, I can buy a part of it, but one part cannot be left alone. No way the issues we continue to see are never told to him and nothing is going on to help. In no way could a regular employee think if the performance to expectation gap continued to be so large that nothing was going to happen. 18 games almost all well below expectation and needs. So there was a reconning on the horizon and here we are, Bryce should have expected something based on so many bad performances and 2 of the worst this year and the feedback. Now the part I believe. He didn't have a seat in the all-hands call Monday morning, his level doesn't get in that meeting. Also, you generally don't tell a new guy, hey we are looking at firing/benching you this early (AKA preseason here). So I can buy he was told closer to the press conference on Monday, and they didn't tell him earlier as the all hands call with the coaches on up sealed the deal Monday morning.
    • There are people in here right now that still, after all we have seen, have refused to accept any narrative that doesn’t have Bryce as the victim. You can’t fight that without getting worn out     it was speculation until NFL games are in the books, because the people who will not accept what you are trying to tell them, can say you can’t prove that.  Peyton had a horrible rookie year, never Jamarcus Russell had a horrible rookie year.  Until Bryce throws his first NFL INT I couldn’t prove to some people that he was capable of throwing one. 
×
×
  • Create New...