Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I dont mean to sound stupid


SCMunnerlyn1

Recommended Posts

im hearing a lot of talk about if we CUT players we take a cap HIT ... why is this .. if u no longer have anything left to pay .. isnt there contract null and void besides the guaraunteed and we then have money ? i dont understand how we would lose .. please explain it to me .. this has been confusing me for weeks ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, a part of their contracted rate is applied against the team's salary cap. This was done as part of the collective bargaining agreement to keep teams from simply cutting a high priced player to clear up room without any penalty.

(See Ken Lucas for an example.)

If a player retires, however, there is no such penalty because it is supposedly done by the player's judgement rather than by a cold hard business decision.

It's meant to protect veteran players, to keep teams from going "on the cheap" instantaneously, and to promote trades wherein cap hits are traded along with the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so if they are cut .. does that mean we immediately have to fork over the guaranteed contract money and our cap is hit or what?

It's kinda like this.

Joe Smith signs with the Panthers

He gets a 20 million contract for 5 years. with a 10 million signing bonus.

He gets that 10 million when he signs the paper.

Then gets 2 million a year salary.

To make the cap hit easier.

The panthers could spread out the "hit" of the 10 million bonus across the 5 years. The player already has his 10 million but you are spreading that "hit" across 5 years.

Like this

Year

1 2 million salary + 500k bonus hit = 2.5 million cap hit

2 2 mill salary + 500K bonus hit = 2.5 mill cap hit

3 2 mill sal + 1 million k bonus hit = 3 mill cap hit

4 2 mill salary + 1 mill bonus hit = 3 mill cap hit

5 2 mill salary + 6 mill bonus hit = 8 mill cap hit

That would be a backloaded contract and is very simplified.

You could cut the guy in year 4 and save 2 million towards his cap hit if you wanted.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im starting to understand a little better .. so as i see it now .. we take a penalty every time a longer contracted player is cut such as if we were to cut someone like delhomme the hit would be bigger because of a hefty contract plus extensions ? is it the shorter/smaller a contract the smaller the hit or does length not matter at all ? and yes dockery it seemed appropriate for me to ask because i couldnt figure it out and it seemed only a select 7 or 8 guys were talking about cap and everyone else was just reading the how much will peppers make a game thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's kinda like this.

Joe Smith signs with the Panthers

He gets a 20 million contract for 5 years. with a 10 million signing bonus.

He gets that 10 million when he signs the paper.

Then gets 2 million a year salary.

To make the cap hit easier.

The panthers could spread out the "hit" of the 10 million bonus across the 5 years. The player already has his 10 million but you are spreading that "hit" across 5 years.

Like this

Year

1 2 million salary + 500k bonus hit = 2.5 million cap hit

2 2 mill salary + 500K bonus hit = 2.5 mill cap hit

3 2 mill sal + 1 million k bonus hit = 3 mill cap hit

4 2 mill salary + 1 mill bonus hit = 3 mill cap hit

5 2 mill salary + 6 mill bonus hit = 8 mill cap hit

That would be a backloaded contract and is very simplified.

You could cut the guy in year 4 and save 2 million towards his cap hit if you wanted.

Hope that helps

In this case you would definitely not want to cut him in year four and I know it is simplified but if you thought you wouldn't want to keep him five years you would give him the six million in year 5 not as a guaranteed signing bonus but a conditional roster bonus.

In your scenario if he got cut year 4 we would be on the hook for the 1 million bonus for that year and the 6 million bonus would be due immediately which is guaranteed in year 5.

In my scenario which is what happened with Moose the first time, we didn't keep him in 2005 and we didn't have to pay a huge roster bonus of 10 million. Using your example, by making it a roster bonus we wouldn't have to pay it if he were cut and we wouldn't be on the hook for it as long as he wasn't on the roster when the bonus was due.

Just sayin................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You keep rounding up to $10 in order to exaggerate your point which usually means your point is very strong.  Bijan is making 5.5 millions a year to Chuba's 8.5 and they used an absolute premium pick on him in a top 10 pick.  That pick vs were we picked Chuba or even Brooks are two very different draft prospects.  Chuba has the attitude and skillset we want to build a better team and culture.  He has shown he can be a top RB and we are paying him a moderate salary. You also need to look at the contract again.  Only $15 million is guaranteed.  It could look very similar to that Henry 2 year $16 million dollar one you are suggesting we do instead.  Always look at the guaranteed vs the total money.  If Chuba gets the total money he is cooking and we are happy.   You want us to use assets elsewhere because we have so many holes but you also want us to draft another WR in the first, probably top 5 this year will all of the other holes we have on the roster.  To me those two opinions don't line up.  Back to back 1st round picks on WRs when we have so many holes.  I think we are just keeping good young players that want to be here and Chuba fits the mold.  TMac could also fit that mold.  
    • I dont believe Bryce is the future at all but I also dont believe we should use a first on Sanders or Ward. Grab someone later in the draft or wait until next year is what I would do but if I were always right I would be a GM so theres that too I guess.
    • I swear there are like 6 people on this godforsaken website that must be paid just to piss and moan all day in these stupid ass threads, for years on end, about fugging everything. Always something to whine about. If y'all aren't getting paid to professionally bitch about this team at every opportunity you need to reevaluate your lives because that ish is pathetic for grown ass men to be doing.  There are at least 50 other voices of reason in here. They're all smarter than you kneejerking perpetual contrarians. It's a fine contract. Our previous dipstick GM ran this team like some college kid that read a few Investopedia articles on technical trading and started throwing daddy's money at every positive indicator he saw - look what happened when Fitt drafted by RAS because he couldn't identify talent if it was footballs deep in his wife in the war room. It's a football team and this preoccupation with analytics, in this instance the positional value of RBs, is like 30% of the equation. It's not wholly inaccurate, but it requires a lot of context and, going back to the trading analogy, an understanding of the fundamentals. This is a sad, crappy organization that needs some winning attitudes in the locker room and on the field. $15 mil guaranteed over two years is nothing compared to the intangible value he brings, and the message the contract sends, not to mention his stellar work ethic and consistent improvement. 
×
×
  • Create New...