Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you ever feel like punching yourself in the balls for passing up on a deal?


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

So I am notorious for negotiating very good deals whenever I buy something....whether it be a car, home electronics, work done on my house, etc...I feel like I am pretty good at getting the best price.

Anyway, on Friday on my way home, I see an estate sale sign in the country club neighborhood next to my house. IF you have never been to an estate sale, you basically walk through someone's furnished home and everything in sight is for sale.

This particular house had a 63" Samsung Plasma, Apple TV, a HD TiVo, and a Bose 321 surround sound system all for sale for $800. Even though I don't need any of this stuff, for my own amusement, I decide to see how cheap I can talk her down. I talk her down to $650 for everything above out the door.

I decide that I am going to think about it as I continue to walk through the house. I look up the TV, and it was manufactured in 2007...which means most of the stuff is probably 6-10 years old. I decide I don't want to risk buying a 8 yr old plasma, even though it would be a nice upgrade to my 55" Sharp in my bedroom. So I pass on the deal.

I thought about it that entire evening. So I go back on Saturday morning and it was already sold. Someone paid $800 for it!

So I am pissed about losing this deal. Even though I didnt "need" that stuff, I probably could have made use of it or sold it for profit. I guess on the bright side is that I still have my money!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rule 1: Don't dwell on passed up deals. If you do, the next deal that comes along, you'll end up jumping all over it just because of the last deal you passed on, not necessarily because you want the product.

 

Unless you know the use history of the plasma, it was a risky purchase to begin with. The plasma is a second generation and likely only has a 30,000 - 60,000 life expectancy (8-15 years @ 10hrs of use per day).

 

Rule 2: If you knew- I mean, really knew- you wanted the stuff, you would not have had any second thoughts or doubts and you would have made the deal. You did not, so move on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah...fug stuff you don't need. Deal or not. I go to car dealerships regularly and haggle cars I have no intention buying. I could probably make a living off it if I wanted. I've flipped cars a couple times and always make at least $1,000.

Found a beautiful Honda one day and talked the guy waaaaaay down. I could have made several thousands but didn't buy it because the guy had an attitude, which he should have had because he wasn't making poo on the deal besides a sale quota.

But money is much better to have than poo you don't need, and there is only one thing I love more than money, women and footballs and that's my time. It's just not worth it sometimes, don't sweat it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you made the right choice...that plasma could've been on its last legs.  My plasma's motherboard fried last year and I had it 8 years.  You just never know.  Risk was too high. You did good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think taking T-Mac changes how to look at XL and the season he had, especially in retrospect. If you look at his rookie season from the viewpoint of "we traded into the 1st round to take him as our #1 WR of the future" then yea, he had a god awful rookie season and I'd be scared about his future.  But we've now drafted T-Mac, it allows us to now go back and look at XL's rookie season in a totally different light. XL was a late bloomer, essentially having only one college season of experience, he was always going to be VERY raw last year.  If we knew at the time that one year later, we'd have a true #1 and XL "only needs to be a future #2 and potentially doing it from a power slot position" then I'm not so sure he had all that bad of a rookie season. Because he still had 49 catches for 500 yards and 4 TDs, which really is a pretty darn good rookie season for a player as raw as XL was/is, especially when you consider the QB struggles we had last year, and even once Bryce turned things around a bit, we were still a run based team and Bryce's stats were anything but mind-blowing.   Personally, I think it's one of those situations where people are too focused on the negatives with XL and not seeing all the positives and potential he has given how raw he still is.  Which is where viewing him as a future #2 vs #1 makes all the difference in the world in looking back on his rookie season and projecting his future role/ability. If he's worked on his craft and cuts back on his drops, it's very reasonable to think he could be a 70 catch, 800 yards, and 5 TD type of player for us in year 3 when he's the #2 after Thielen is gone. How many teams have that type of talent as their #2 WR behind a guy putting up 1,200+ and 10 on a yearly basis as their #1 as I fully expect T-Mac to be doing? Then if Coker also improves slightly and is kicking in 600-700 yards himself, then you've built yourself a Top 5 WR room.
    • Mel Kiper's long illustrious history would also indicate that neither does Mel Kiper. It's almost like this poo isn't an exact science or something and that there's a lot of different variables that go into whether or not a guy is successful. It's just that according to Mel Kiper, everyone else is an idiot and he's perfect. LOL 
    • Pats traded randy moss to aquire Ryan Mallett.  Insane. Guess Mel Kiper was right. NFL doesn't know how to evaluate quarterbacks
×
×
  • Create New...